期刊文献+

不方便法院原则实施条件比较与借鉴 被引量:2

On Comparison and Use of the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens
原文传递
导出
摘要 不方便法院原则是源于英美法系确定国际私法管辖权的一项重要制度,同时它也是解决国际民商事管辖权的积极冲突的有效解决方式。正因为如此,大陆法系的国内立法也在积极借鉴采用不方便法院原则,但两者的差异根深于其各自独立的法律文化影响。我国在借鉴该项制度时应结合我国的法律文化进行一定程度的革新。 The doctrine of forum non conveniens which is one of jurisdictions of common law became an important effective method to settle the positive conflict d international civil and commercial jurisdiction , therefore, continent law use the doctrine in its domestic legislation. But the difference of the doctrine used in the two law systems is because of the influence of their law culture. China should innovate the doctrine on certain degree based on its law culture when she uses it.
作者 邱润根
出处 《法学论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第1期109-115,共7页 Legal Forum
基金 2008年江西省高校人文课题 南昌大学基金课题"中国国际私法发展的路径依赖"的阶段性研究成果
关键词 不方便法院原则 实施条件 比较 借鉴 doctrine of forum non conveniens practice conditions comparison use
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Cheshier and North, Private International Law [M]. London: Butterworths,1970:251. 被引量:1
  • 2李双元,欧福永.中国国际私法通论[M].北京:法律出版社,2007:522. 被引量:6
  • 3John Bies, Conditioning Forum Non Conveniens [J].67 U. Chi. L. Rev.,1995. 被引量:1
  • 4张茂著..美国国际民事诉讼法[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999:325.
  • 5Roger S. Foster, Place of Trial - interstate Application of Interstate Methods of Adjustment [J]. 44 Harvard .law. Review. 1994. 被引量:1
  • 6Ronald A. Bland, Comparative Forum Non Conveniens and Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments [J]. 37Tex. 'l L.J. ,1999. 被引量:1
  • 7A. Reus, Judicial Discretion: A Comparative View of the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens in the United States , the United Kingdom , and Germany [J ]. 16 Loyola of Los Angeles International Comparative law Journal. 1994. 被引量:1
  • 8Gordon E. Maag , Forum Non Conveniens in Illinois: A historical Review. Critical Analysis and Proposal for change[J]. 25S.Ill.U.L.J. ,2001. 被引量:1
  • 9Uniform Intersate and International Procedure Act [M]. 11Am.J.Comp. L., 1962. 被引量:1
  • 10Wendy Kenett, Forum Non Conveniens in Europe [J] .54 Cambridge L.J., 1995. 被引量:1

二级参考文献109

  • 1I.e., Garter v. Trafalgar Tours Ltd., see 704 F. Sapp. (W.D.VIR. 1989), p. 673. 被引量:1
  • 2See A. A. Ehrenzweig, op. cit., p. 305. 被引量:1
  • 3Cf., Permanent Bureau, 1996 Prel. Doe. No. 3, p. 2. 被引量:1
  • 4Cf., for instance, A. F. Lowenfeld, Forum Shopping, Antisuit Injunctions, Negative Declarations, and Rdated Tools of Internationational Litigation, 91 The American Journal of International Law (1997), pp. 322-324. 被引量:1
  • 5Cf., Permanent Bureau, op cit., p. 4. 被引量:1
  • 6Cf., Permanent Bureau, op cit., p. 2. 被引量:1
  • 7Cf., Permanent Bureau, Synthesis of the Work of the Special Commission of March 1998 on International Jurisdiction and the Efofats of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, drawn by Catherine Kessedjian, Preliminary Document No. 9 (1998), para. 101, p. 43. 被引量:1
  • 8中国国际私法学会.《中华人民共和国国际私法示范法》(第6稿)第51条. 被引量:1
  • 9See J. J. Fawcett, Declining Jurisdiction in Private International Law (Oxford 1995), p. 10. 被引量:1
  • 10P. Prince, Bhopal,Bougainville and Ok Tedi : Why Australia' s Forum Non Conveniens Approach Is Better, 47 The Intemational and Comparative Law Quarterly (1998), p. 573. 被引量:1

共引文献21

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部