期刊文献+

抑郁认知易感性的新解释——双重加工模型 被引量:11

New Explanation on Cognitive Vulnerability to Depression: A Dual Process Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 双重加工模型认为人类拥有两种信息加工模式,联想模式是快速、不需努力的加工,以良好学习联想(well-learned associations)为基础;反思模式是慢速的、需要付出努力的加工,建立在基于规则的符号推理基础上。联想模式的发生是自动化的,当预期被违反时,执行反思模式,并需要足够的认知资源。当反思加工没有校正消极的有偏向的联想加工时,就会表现出抑郁的认知易感性。双重加工模型对抑郁认知易感性的评估、病原学和治疗提出了新的看法。 According to dual process theories, humans possess two modes of information processing. An associative mode involves quick, effortless processing that rests on well-learned associations. A reflective mode involves slow, effortful processing that rests on symbolic rule-based inferences. Whereas the associative mode occurs automatically, the reflective mode operates when expectancies are violated and sufficient cognitive resources are available to respond. A cognitive vulnerability to depression is observed when negatively biased associative processing is uncorrected by reflective processing. New insights and implications for assessment, etiology, and treatment of cognitive vulnerability to depression are discussed in the dual process model.
作者 高华 彭新波
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第1期132-137,共6页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 湖南省教育厅科学研究项目(06C339)资助
关键词 信息加工 双重加工 抑郁认知易感性 information processing dual processes cognitive vulnerability to depression
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I., & Alloy, L. B. (1989). Hopelessness depression: A theory-based subtype of depression. Psychological Review, 96,358-372. 被引量:1
  • 2Alloy, L. B., Abramson, L. Y., & Whitehouse, W. G. (2006). Prospective incidence of first onsets and recurrences of depression in individuals at high and low cognitive risk for depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 145-156. 被引量:1
  • 3Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford. 被引量:1
  • 4Beevers, C., & Meyer, B. (2004). Thought suppression and depression risk. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 859-867. 被引量:1
  • 5Beevers, C. G. (2005). Cognitive vulnerability to depression: A dual process model. Clinical Psychology Revie , 25, 975-1002. 被引量:1
  • 6Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766. 被引量:1
  • 7De Houwer, J. (2002). The implicit association test as a tool for studying dysfunctional associations in psychopathology: Strengths and limitations. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 35,115-133. 被引量:1
  • 8Ellis, H. C., Moore, B. A., Varner, L. J., & Ottaway, S. A. (1997). Depressed mood, task organization, cognitive interference, and memory: Irrelevant thoughts predict recall performance. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 453-470. 被引量:1
  • 9Forgas, J. P. (2000). Managing moods: Toward a dual-process theory of spontaneous mood regulation. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 172-177. 被引量:1
  • 10Forgas, J. P., & Ciarrochi, J. V. (2002). On managing moods: Evidence for the role of homeostatic cognitive strategies in affect regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 336-345. 被引量:1

同被引文献113

引证文献11

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部