期刊文献+

意向性观念的祛魅与重构 被引量:1

Disenchantment and Reconstruction of Intentionality Concept
下载PDF
导出
摘要 意向性一直是西方哲学的固有领地,国内现有关注多集中在评介之上。文章试图直接切入有关问题的前沿研究,阐述一种解答的策略,认为,意向性研究的第一步不应是直接提出新的理论,而应是祛魅,是意向习语的语言发生学研究。在揭示意向性的本体论地位,科学再现意向性的地形学、结构论和运动学的过程中,应着力抛弃拟人论和隐喻式模型,既通过本体论的"元问题"的研究澄清意向性的存在特点,又根据脑科学和进化生物学等科学成果具体说明它的物质基础与发生过程及机制。 As an inherent field of Western Philosophy, intentionality did not get deserved disquisition except some reviews. This paper tries to develop a new solution to intentionality by introducing the last word about concerned problems. It suggests that, in our study on intentionality, the first step should not be developing a new theory but rather the disenchantment, the linguistic genetic theoretical approach to intentional idiom. To reveal the ontological status of Intentionality ulteriorly, scientifically represent the geomorphology, structuralism and kinematics of intentionality, we should abandon the model of personification and metaphorization.Thus we can not only clarify the characteristic of intentional existence by studying ontological ‘meta-problem’, but also discover the substantial base, the generate course and regimes of intentionality on the basis of the scientific achievements.
作者 高新民 殷筱
出处 《科学技术与辩证法》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第1期22-26,共5页 Science Technology and Dialectics
基金 国家社科基金青年项目"当代西方心灵哲学中的唯物主义研究"(08CZX014)
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1马克思,恩格斯著,中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局编译..马克思恩格斯选集 第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:974.
  • 2罗蒂.哲学和自然之镜[M].北京:三联书店,1987.. 被引量:29
  • 3Heil J. Philosophy of Mind: A Contemporary Introduction [ M ]. New York and London : Rutledge, 1988. 被引量:1
  • 4卡尔文W.大脑如何思维[M].杨雄里,梁培基,译.上海:上海科技出版社,1996. 被引量:1
  • 5本格.科学的唯物主义[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1989. 被引量:5

共引文献32

同被引文献26

  • 1曾文雄.翻译学“语用学转向”:“语言学转向”与“文化转向”的终结[J].社会科学家,2006,21(5):193-197. 被引量:22
  • 2Abramson, D. (2011) . Philosophy of mind is (in part) philosophy of computer science. Minds and Machines, 21 (2) , 203-219. 被引量:1
  • 3Atony, L (2010) . Realization theory and the philosophy of mind: Comments on Sydney Shoemaker's physical realization. Philoso- phy Study, 148, 89-99. 被引量:1
  • 4Bosse, T., Schut, M. C., & Treur, J. (2009) . Formal analysis of dynamics within philosophy of mind by computer simulation. Minds and Machines Journal, 19, 543-555. 被引量:1
  • 5Clark, A. (1999) . An embodied cognitive science? Trends in Cog- nitive Science, 3 (9) , 345-351. 被引量:1
  • 6Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999) . Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books. 被引量:1
  • 7Mattens, P. (2009) . Perception, body, and the sense of touch: Phe- nomenology and philosophy of mind. Husserl Study, 25, 97-120. 被引量:1
  • 8Osnos, E. (2014) . Age of ambition: Chasing future, truth, and faith in the new China. London, The Bodley Head Ltd. 被引量:1
  • 9Taylor, J. H. (2013) . Physicalism ontology and philosophy of 1283-1297. and phenomenal concepts: Bringing mind together. Philosophia, 41,. 被引量:1
  • 10徐英瑾.对“汉字屋论证”逻辑结构的五种诊断模式[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2008,50(3):82-89. 被引量:5

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部