期刊文献+

Dot-IGSS和Dot-ELISA法检测GBM-Ab和Tub-Ab的比较研究 被引量:3

Comparison Study of Detecting GBMAb and TubAb by DotIGSS and DotELISA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本实验应用斑点免疫金银染色(Dot-IGSS)及斑点酶联免疫吸附试验(Dot-ELISA)对50例SLE患者体内的肾小球基底膜抗体(GBM-Ab)及肾小管抗体(Tub-Ab)进行了检测比较。结果表明:Dot-IGSS法检测GBM-Ab和Tub-Ab的阳性率分别是62%和76%,Dot-ELISA法检测GBM-Ab和Tub-Ab的阳性率分别是68%和78%。两法检查抗体阳性率间无明显差异。两法检查GBM-Ab的滴度无显著差异,而Dot-IGSS检查Tub-Ab的滴度高于Dot-ELIAS检查,两法有显著性差异(p<0.05)。以上结果提示:Dot-IGSS法或Dot-ELISA法检测GBM-Ab和Tub-Ab虽有相似的敏感性,但从测定抗体滴度等方面考虑,Dot-IGSS法优于Dot-ELISA法。 In the experiment, glomerular basement membrane antibody (GBMAb) and renal tubular antibody (TubAb) of 50 patients with SLE were detected by dotimmunogold silver staining (DotIGSS) or dotenzyme linked immunosorbent assay (DotELISA). The result showed that the positive rates of detecting GBMAb and TubAb by DotIGSS or by DotELISA were 62% and 76% or 68% and 78% respectively.The difference between positive rates of measuring GBMAb and TubAb in the two methods were insignificance. Moreover,the detecting antibody titers by DotIGSS were higher than those by DotELISA. The difference of GBMAb titers between the two methods was insignificance,but the difference of TubAb between the two methods was significance (P<0.05).The results indicate that although detecting GBMAb and TubAb by DotIGSS or DotELISA have similar sensitivity, the method of DotIGSS is better than that of DotELISA on measuring the titers of GBMAb and TubAb.
出处 《基础医学与临床》 CSCD 1998年第1期27-30,共4页 Basic and Clinical Medicine
关键词 系统性 红斑狼疮 ELISA Dot-IGSS GBM-Ab DotIGSS DotELISA SLE glomerular basement membrane
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献2

共引文献8

同被引文献7

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部