摘要
沈长云先生的系列论文所持"古夏族兴起于古河济之间"和"濮阳即禹都阳城"的"崭新"论点是建立在对文献材料和考古学资料缺乏深入研究和理性思考基础上的单方面主观想象。沈先生论文中所表现出的证据不足,主观武断等缺乏科学分析的态度,必然使其夏史研究陷入一永远无法走出的误区,极不利于目前的夏史研究。
The ＂brand-new＂ argumentation proposed by Professor Shen Changyun in his series of academic papers is purely one-sided and subjective supposition .which holds two aspects： one is the ancient Xia Clan rose between Ji River and He River; the other is Puyang is Yangcheng,the ancienl capital of Yu. Deep research and rational thinking about information in documents and archeology are neglected. Lack of evidence and subjective judgments in the essays definitely will cause misunderstanding about history of Xia Dynasty. which means a great harm to the present research.
出处
《南方文物》
2008年第4期26-33,共8页
Cultural Relics in Southern China
基金
2007年度国家社科基金一般项目<中国早期四土经营与民族整合>。批准号:07BZS008
关键词
沈长云
夏
禹
河济
濮阳
误区
shen Changyun＇ Xia
Yu
He River and Ji River
Puyang, misunderstanding
