期刊文献+

文学疆域的拓宽和思维观念的颠覆--论特纳的《文学的心灵》 被引量:5

A Cognitive Approach to Literature and Mark Turner's The Literary Mind
原文传递
导出
摘要 特纳认为,故事、投射和寓言不仅仅体现在文学作品中,也是人类思维的基本方式;他发现混合和多重的空间在认知过程中具有重大意义,独特的自我只有超越有限的时空才能把握故事,了解别人和自我;他还颠覆了传统的语言起源理论,认为语言源自故事和寓言。 According to Mark Turner, story, projection and parable are not only elements of literature but also basic means of human thinking. Mixed spaces and multiple spaces are very useful in limited time and space in the process of cognition; the singular self should go beyond its order to comprehend a story and to understand him/herself and others. Turner also subverts the traditional theory about the origins of language, arguing that story and parable are the sources of language.
作者 何辉斌
出处 《当代外国文学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第1期55-64,共10页 Contemporary Foreign Literature
关键词 马克·特纳 文学疆域 思维观《文学的心灵》 Mark Turner, literary domain, idea of thinking, The Literary Mind
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Barrie, James M. Peter and Wendy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991. 被引量:1
  • 2Dutton, Denis. “Which Came First, the Language or Grammar?” Philosophy and Literature 22. 1 (1998) : 261-69. 被引量:1
  • 3Edelman, Gerald M. The Remembered Present: A Biological Theory of Consciousness. New York: Basic Books, 1989. 被引量:1
  • 4荷马.《荷马史诗·奥德赛》,王焕生译,北京:人民文学出版社,2003年. 被引量:3
  • 5Johansen, Jurgen Dines. “Toward a Cognitive Rhetoric.” The Semiotic Review of Books 8.3 (1997). 被引量:1
  • 6http://www. chass, toronto, edu/epc/srb/srb/rhetoric, html . 被引量:1
  • 7Richardson, Alan, and Ellen Spolsky, eds. The Work of Fiction. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2004. 被引量:1
  • 8Shakespeare, William. The Life and Death of King John, Shakespeare Complete Works. London: Oxford University Press, 1996. 被引量:1
  • 9莎士比亚.《仲夏夜之梦》,《莎士比亚全集》第2卷,朱生豪译,北京:人民文学出版社,1991年. 被引量:1
  • 10Strauss, Claudia. “Brain, Minds, and Texts : A Review of Mark Turner's The Literary Mind.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 7.2 (1997) : 235-36. 被引量:1

共引文献2

同被引文献16

  • 1Gavins,Joanna&Steen,Gerard,eds.Cognitive Poetics in Prac-tice.London and New York:Routledge,2003. 被引量:1
  • 2Otlay,Keith.“Writingandreading:the future of cognitive poetics.”In:Gavins,Joanna&Steen,Gerard,eds.Cognitive Poetics in Practice.London and New York:Routledge,2003.161-173. 被引量:1
  • 3Stocwell,Peter.Cognitive Poetics:An Introduction.London and New York:Rout6ledge,2005. 被引量:1
  • 4Turner,Mark.The Literary Mind.New York:Oxford UniversityPress,1996. 被引量:1
  • 5亚里士多德,贺拉斯.诗学.诗艺.罗念生,杨周涵译.北京:人民文学出版社,1962. 被引量:1
  • 6钱钟书,著.钱钟书散文[M]. 浙江文艺出版社, 2006 被引量:1
  • 7Sadler L V. John Bunyan [M]. Boston, Twayne Publishers, 1979. 被引量:1
  • 8Zunshine L. Introduction to Cognitive Literary Studies [C] // Zunshine L. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Literary Studies. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015. 被引量:1
  • 9Turner M. The Literary Mind [M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996. 被引量:1
  • 10Sweetman D J. Samuel Taylor Coleridge and John Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress: Symbol and Allegory as Literary Representations of Redemption [D]. Madison: The Casperson School of Graduate Shudies, Drew University, 2012 : 23. 被引量:1

引证文献5

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部