摘要
从本然角度看,结果加重犯是结果责任的产物;从实然角度看,虽然近代刑法对结果加重犯要求行为人对重结果最低具有预见可能性,贯彻了责任主义原则。但是,仍然存在着刑罚过重、有违罪责刑相应原则之嫌,特别是在我国,结果加重犯的立法存在数量较多、形式特征不明显、加重结果的内容缺乏限定等缺陷。为此,必须在应然层面上,寻找出确立结果加重犯应遵循的若干原则,并在这些原则的指导下,厘清结果加重犯的范围。
From the point of incipient state, the aggravated consquential offence rooted result liability; From the angle of actuality, the aggravated consquential offence in a sense of latter- day criminal law requires a person to be likely to forecast aggravated consequence at the lowest and then carrys out responsibility principle. Whereas the aggravated consquential offence is on suspicion of overweight criminal law and violating the principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime, especially in Chi- na, the legislation of the aggravated consquential offence has many disadvantages： larger quantity lawmaking , unconspicuous form characteristics, unrestr.ained contents of aggravated consequences and so Therefore, from natural aspect, finding out some principles on establishing the aggravated consquen- offence and raveling the scope of aggravated consquential offence are necessary.
出处
《当代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第1期118-122,共5页
Contemporary Law Review
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究(2008年度)规划"刑法竞合问题研究"中期成果之一
关键词
结果加重犯
结果责任
责任主义
犯罪类型
aggravated consquential offence
consequence liability
responsibilism
crime types
