摘要
目的通过国产ZQL滤器与Optease滤器置入后并发症的对照研究,探讨国产滤器的临床应用价值。方法因静脉血栓和(或)肺栓塞放置滤器的患者,置国产滤器为甲组,进口滤器为乙组,术后行腹平片、下肢静脉造影和(或)肺动脉造影及下肢静脉彩超检查,怀疑肺栓塞的患者行CT检查。结果甲组术后1人滤器移位,1人滤器内有血栓,2人下肢静脉血栓,2人下腔静脉阻塞,1人肺栓塞。乙组术后2人滤器内有血栓,8人下肢静脉血栓,8人下腔静脉阻塞,1人滤器穿破静脉壁,1人肺栓塞。两组并发症数据均进行χ2检验,结果无统计学差别(P>0.05)。结论国产ZQL滤器置入后并发症和Optease滤器相比无明显差别,可以替代进口滤器的应用。
Objective To evaluate the clinical value of the home-made ZQL-type vena cava filter by comparing post-implantation＇s complications between the home- made ZQL-type vena eava filter and imported Optease vena cava filter. Methods The eases with home-made filter were named group Ⅰ and the cases with imported filter group Ⅱ. The abdominal X-ray plane graph, angiography of pulmonary artery and ultrasonography were conducted after the operation. And CT was performed to doubtful pulmonary embolism. Results There were one filter migration （ 〉10cm ）, one thrombus inside the filter, two deep vena thrombosis, two obstruction of inferior vena cava and one pulmonary embolism in group I, while there were two thrombus inside the filter, eight deep vena thrombosis, eight obstruction of inferior vena eava, one Ormond＇s syndrome and one pulmonary embolism in group Ⅱ . Conclusion There is no significant difference in complications of post-operation between the home-made ZQL-type vena eava filter and the imported Optease filter.
出处
《中国医科大学学报》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2008年第5期641-643,共3页
Journal of China Medical University
关键词
国产滤器
进口Optease滤器
并发症
对照研究
home-made vena cava filter
imported Optease vena cava filter
complication
comparison
