摘要
文章通过分析麦卡勒斯和泰勒教授对柏林的批判,试图澄清柏林"两种自由区分"的内涵和价值。分析查尔斯.泰勒教授的"机会概念"和"运用概念"之后,文章指出柏林的"消极自由"并不是狭隘的惰性自由,消极自由自身即带有积极但有限的"能力"的意味;通过重新研读柏林的《两种自由》原文,认为"积极自由"的形而上基础是对启蒙以降"理性"能力的非理性扩张,而对积极自由有害性的有效限制则应始自对理性的基本怀疑。
With the analysis of McCullers and Taylor＇s criticism on Berlin, the connotation and value of the Berlin ＂distinguishing two freedoms＂. Based on the analysis of Professor Tailor＇s ＂chance＂ and ＂exertion＂, it is pointed out that ＂the negative freedom＂, which carries positive but limited competence,is not the passive freedom in a narrow sense. After reading the original version of ＂Two Freedoms＂ , it is believed that ＂positive freedom＂ is the irrational expansion by lowing the rational competence.
出处
《哈尔滨学院学报》
2008年第12期18-21,共4页
Journal of Harbin University
关键词
自由
柏林
泰勒
麦卡勒斯
两种自由说
freedom
Berlin
Taylor
McCullers
theory of two freedom
