期刊文献+

合成与天然外源性表面活性物质治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的meta分析 被引量:2

Meta-analysis of treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: synthetic versus natural pulmonary surfactant extracts
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价合成与天然的表面活性物质治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效和安全性。方法检索Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、EMBASE、中国生物医学文献光盘数据库、中国期刊全文数据库和中国维普数据库等,检索时间均从建库至2007年12月31日,由3名系统评价员进行资料提取和质量评价,对同质资料进行meta分析。结果共纳入13项研究(n=4841)。根据随机方法、分配隐藏、盲法和随访情况描述评分,11项为A级,1项为B级,1项为C级。meta分析结果显示:①蛋白类合成与天然的外源性表面活性物质对比治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征,其病死率(OR=0.76,95%CI:0.56-1.04),慢性肺疾病(OR=1.06,95%CI:0.81-1.40),慢性肺疾病和死亡(OR=1.00,95%CI:0.77-1.31),脓毒症(OR=1.01,95%CI:0.75-1.36),动脉导管未闭(OR=0.97,95%CI:0.59-1.62),气胸(OR=1.00,95%CI:0.69-1.45),差异均无统计学意义。②非蛋白类合成与天然的外源性表面活性物质对比治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征,病死率(OR=1.13,95%CI:0.97-1.32;χ2=14.38,P=0.11);慢性肺疾病(OR=1.08,95%CI:0.92-1.26;χ2=3.45,P=0.49);脓毒症(OR=1.05,95%CI:0.90-1.21;χ2=13.10,P=0.07);动脉导管未闭(OR=1.02,95%CI:0.86-1.21;χ2=6.74,P=0.24);慢性肺疾病和死亡(随机效应模型)(OR=1.04,95%CI:0.79-1.37;χ2=6.53,P=0.09)等差异均无统计学意义。气胸(OR=1.55,95%CI:1.28-1.87;χ2=10.01,P=0.26)差异有统计学意义。结论蛋白类合成表面活性物质无论在安全性还是疗效方面均不差于天然表面活性物质;非蛋白类合成表面活性物质的疗效与天然性表面活性物质差异无统计学意义,但安全性方面差于天然性表面活性物质。 Objectives To assess the effectiveness and safety of synthetic surfactant versus natural surfaetant extracts for treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Methods The data from Coehrane library, PubMed, EMBASE, CBMdisc, CNKI, VIP have been searched from the establishment of the database till 31 December 2007. Data extraction, quality assessment, and meta-analysis for the results of homogeneous studies were done by three reviewers. Results Thirteen studies with 4 841 participants were included. All the studies were graded in terms of randomization, allocation concealment and blinding. Eleven studies were graded as A, one as B, and one as C. The result of recta-analysis showed: 1 ) Protein-containing synthetic suffaetant vs animal-derived suffactant: there was no statistical significance on mortality (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.56- 1.04), chronic lung disease (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.81- 1.40), chronic lung disease or death (OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.77- 1.31), sepsis (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.75- 1.36), patent duetus arteriosus(OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.59 - 1.62), pneumothorax (OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.69 - 1.45). 2) Non-proteincontaining synthetic suffaetant vs animal-derived suffactant: there was no statistical significance on mortality (OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.97- 1.32), chronic lung disease (OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.92- 1.26), sepsis (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.90- 1.21), patent ductus arteriosus (OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.86 - 1.21) chronic lung disease or death (random)(OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.79- 1.3). However, the difference on occurrence of pneumothorax (OR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.28- 1.87) was significant (χ^2 = 10.01, P = 0.26). Conclusions Available evidence showed that compared with animal-derived suffactant, protein-containing synthetic suffactant was at least comparable with, if not superior to, that of animal-derived surfactants. The non-protein-containing synthetic surfactant was similar to animal-derived surfactant oneffectiveness, but not on safet
出处 《临床儿科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第12期1074-1081,共8页 Journal of Clinical Pediatrics
关键词 新生儿 肺表面活性物质 呼吸窘迫综合征 META分析 neonate pulmonary surfactant respiratory distress syndrome meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Halliday HL. History of surfactant from 1980 [J]. Biol Neonate, 2005,87 (4) : 317 -322. 被引量:1
  • 2Moya FR,Gadzinowski J, Bancalari E, et al. A multicenter, randomized, masked, comparison trial of lueinaetant, colfosceril palmitate, and beractant for the prevention of respiratory distress syndrome among very preterm infants [J]. Pediatrics, 2005,115(4) : 1018-1029. 被引量:1
  • 3Sinha SK,Lacaze-Masmonteil T,Valls i Soler A, et al. A muhicenter, randomized, controlled trial of lucinactant versus poractant alfa among very preterm infants at high risk for respiratory distress syndrome [J]. Pediatrics, 2005,115 (4) :1030-1038. 被引量:1
  • 4Ainsworth SB, Beresford MW, Millligan DW, et al. Pumactant and poractant alfa for treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in neonates born at 25-29 weeks' gestation: a randomized trial[J]. Lancet,2000,355 (9213): 1387-1392. 被引量:1
  • 5Alvarado M, Hingre R, Hakason D, et al. Clinical trial of Survanta versus Exosurf in infants < 1 500g with respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatr Res, 1993,33:314A. 被引量:1
  • 6da Costa DE, Pai MG, A1 Khusaiby SM. Comparative trial of artificial and natural surfactants in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome of prematurity: experiences in a developing country [J]. Pediatr Pulmonol,1999,27(5): 312-317. 被引量:1
  • 7Horbar JD,Wright LL, Soll RF, et al. A multicenter randomized trial comparing two surfactants for the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network [J]. J Pediatr, 1993,123(5) :757-766. 被引量:1
  • 8Hudak ML,Farrell EE, Rosenberg AA, et al. A multicenter randomized masked comparison trial of natural versus synthetic surfactant for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome [J]. J Pediatr, 1996,128(3) :396-406. 被引量:1
  • 9Kukkonen AK, Virtanen M, Jarvenpaa AL, et al. Randomized trial comparing natural and synthetic surfactant: increased infection rate after natural surfactant? [J]. Acta Paediatr, 2000,89 (5) : 556-561. 被引量:1
  • 10Modanlou HD, Beharry K, Padilla G, et al. Comparative efficacy of exosurf and survanta surfactants on early clinical course of respiratory distress syndrome and complications of prematurity [J ]. J Perinatol, 1997,17 (6) :455-460. 被引量:1

二级参考文献10

  • 1宋国维,甘小庄,张艳玲,宋慧琴.肺表面活性物质对重症新生儿肺炎肺氧合功能的影响[J].中华儿科杂志,1995,33(6):336-338. 被引量:28
  • 2Vermot-Oxford Neonatal Network. A Multicenter,randomized trial comparing synthetic surfactant with modified bovine surfactant extract in the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatrics, 1996,97 ( 1 ): 1-6. 被引量:1
  • 3Kukkonen AK,Virtanen M,Jarvenpaa AL,et al. Randomized trial comparing natural and synthetic surfactant increased infection rate after natural surfactant? Acta peadiatr,2000,89(5) :556-561. 被引量:1
  • 4Giannakopoulou C,Hatzidaki E,Korakaki E,et al. Comparative randomized study: Administration of synthetic surfactant to premature newborns with respiratory distress syndrome.Pediatrics Intern, 2002,44(2): 117-121. 被引量:1
  • 5Hudak ML, Martin DJ, Egan EA, et al. A multicenter randomized masked comparison trial of synthetic surfactant versus calf lung surfactant extract in the prevention of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatrics, 1997,100( 1 ) :39-50. 被引量:1
  • 6Iarukova N.The effect of surfactant therapy on the oxygen treatment of premature infant with HMD.Akush Ginokol (Sofiia), 1998,37(1):3-5. 被引量:1
  • 7Victor YH,Feng ZK,Reginald CT,et al.Textbook of neonatal medicine:a Chinese perspective. Hong Kong University Press,1996(1) :265-274. 被引量:1
  • 8Halliday HL.Natural vs synthetic surfactants in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Drugs, 1996,51 (2): 226-237. 被引量:1
  • 9Horbar JD, Wright LL, Soll RF, et al.A multicenter randomized trial comparing two surfactants for the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.J Pediatrics, 1993,123 (5) :757-766. 被引量:1
  • 10Hudak ML, Farell EE,Rosenberg AA,et al.A Multicenter randomized ,masked comparison trial of natural versus synthetic surfactant for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome.J Pediatrics, 1996,128 (3): 396-406. 被引量:1

共引文献22

同被引文献46

  • 1唐为红.固尔苏治疗对新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征患儿气体交换功能的影响[J].新生儿科杂志,2005,20(6):265-267. 被引量:15
  • 2李晓东,田青,包忠宪,吴日勉,何中倩.不同体位气管内注入固尔苏疗效分析[J].实用医学杂志,2007,23(11):1728-1730. 被引量:4
  • 3Koksal N,Akpinar R,Cetinkaya M.Early administration of the second surfactant dose in preterm infants with severe respiratory distress syndrome[J].Turk J Pediatr,2009,51(6):556-564. 被引量:1
  • 4Bae CW,Hahn WH.Surfactant therapy for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome:A review of Korean experiences over 17 years[J].J Korean Med Sci,2009,24(6):1110-1118. 被引量:1
  • 5Engle WA.American academy of pediatrics committee on fetusand newborn.Surfactant-replacement therapy for respiratory distress in the preterm and term neonate[J].Pediatrics,2008,121:2419-2432. 被引量:1
  • 6Brimacombe J,Gandini D,Keller C.The laryngeal mask airway for administration of surfactant in two neonates with respiratory distress syndrome[J].Paediatr Anaesth,2004,14(2):188-190. 被引量:1
  • 7Maksoud-Filho JG,Diniz EM,Ceccon ME,et al.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in a neonate with respiratory distress due to meconium aspiration syndrome:Effect of the administration of exogenous surfactant[J].J Pediatr(Rio J),2001,77(3):243-248. 被引量:1
  • 8Neumayr TM,Watson AM,Wylam ME,et al.Surfactant treatment of an infant with acute idiopathic pulmonary hemorrhage[J].Pediatr Crit Care Med,2008,9(1):4-6. 被引量:1
  • 9Laughon M,Bose C,Moya F,et al.Surfaxin study group.A pilot randomized,controlled trial of later treatment with a peptide-containing,synthetic surfactant for the prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia[J].Pediatrics,2009,123(1):89-96. 被引量:1
  • 10Soil R, Ozek E. Prophylactic protein free synthetic suffactant for pre- venting morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev ,2010, ( 1 ) :CD001079. 被引量:1

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部