摘要
学界对"迪昂—蒯因论点"的讨论主要集中在知识论方面,而对其所谈论的判决性实验很少有专门的研究。其实,迪昂—蒯因论点对判决性实验提出了深刻的意见,并为之刻画了精细的结构。本文以迪昂、蒯因本人的言语为线索,以格伦鲍姆、劳丹、魏德肯等人对迪昂—蒯因论点的反驳或辩护为平台,试着展示迪昂—蒯因论点对判决性实验的意见。
The focal point of educational circles about Duhem-Quine Thesis on knowledge discuss, but the decisive experiment which Duhem- Quine Thesis talk about has been overlooked by the educational circles all along. In fact, Duhem-Quine Thesis has took a lot of and depicted fine structure for decisive experiment. On the basis of well verified data, this paper conclude from what Duhem and Quine themselves said and the refutation or defence of Grtinbaum, Laurens Laudan and Wedeking that Duhem-Quine Thesis made complete opinion to decisive experiment.
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第12期31-36,共6页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
