期刊文献+

胃镜下探条或自制气囊扩张治疗贲门失弛缓症疗效的对比研究

Comparison between Endoscopic Probe and Self-made Balloon Device for Cardia Achalasia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比分析胃镜下应用探条或自制气囊扩张治疗贲门失弛缓症的疗效。方法1998年1月~2007年12月,胃镜下治疗贲门失弛缓症45例,其中应用自制气囊扩张22例(自制气囊组),应用探条扩张23例(探条组),比较2组疗效。结果探条组23例扩张1~9次,平均3.6次;自制气囊组22例扩张1~6次,平均2.3次。2组术中及术后均无并发症发生。首次治疗费用探条组(1542.57±281.30)元,自制气囊组(861.91±176.48)元(t=9.671,P=0.000)。扩张后3个月的疗效2组差异无显著性[探条组显效14例(61%)、有效8例(35%)、无效1例(4%),自制气囊组显效15例(68%)、有效5例(23%)、无效2例(9%),Z=-0.351,P=0.726]。扩张后6个月的疗效2组差异有显著性[探条组显效5例(22%)、有效3例(13%)、无效15例(65%),自制气囊组显效10例(45%)、有效7例(32%)、无效5例(23%),Z=2.564,P=0.010]。结论胃镜下应用探条和自制气囊扩张治疗贲门失弛缓症安全、简便,患者恢复快,尤其自制气囊扩张器设备简单,就地取材,疗效肯定,在基层医院具有良好的推广价值。 Objective To compare the effects of endoscopic probe and self-made balloon device in dilation of the cardia for patients with cardia achalasia. Methods From January 1998 to December 2007, 45 patients with cardia achalasia received gastroscopy-assisted dilation at our hospital ; 22 of them were treated by self-made balloon device and 23 were by endoscopic probe. The efficacies of the two methods were compared. Results In the probe group, each patients received 1 to 9 times of dilation (mean, 3.6) , while in the balloon group it was 1 to 6 times ( mean, 2.3 ). None of the two groups had intra- and post-operative complications. The cost for the first treatment was ( 1542.57 ± 281.30) yuan in probe group, and ( 861.91 ± 176.48) yuan in the balloon group ( t = 9. 671, P = 0. 000). The efficacy of the two groups was similar in 3 months after the treatment [ the rates of the cured, improved, and failed were 61% (14), 35% (8), and 4% (1) in the probe group, and 68% (15), 23% (5), and 9% (2) in the balloon group, Z= -0.351, P=0.726], but significantly different in6 months [22% (5), 13% (3), and 65% (15) vs45% (10), 32% (7), and 23% (5), Z = 2. 564, P = 0. 010]. Conclusions Both endoscopic probe and self-made balloon device are effective in dilatation of the cardia for cardia achalasia. Self-made balloon device dilatation is exceptionally suitable for local hospitals because of its low cost and simple techniques.
出处 《中国微创外科杂志》 CSCD 2008年第12期1082-1084,共3页 Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
关键词 贲门失弛缓症 探条 自制气囊 胃镜 Cardia achalasia Probe Self-made balloon device Endoscope
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献14

  • 1卢清鑫,张志强,王建军,马德福,潘德廷,郭金山,李海云,韩其刚,董山,刘建军,赵学谦,赵强.自制贲门扩张器治疗贲门失弛症(附110例报告)[J].中华放射学杂志,1994,28(3):164-166. 被引量:16
  • 2[2]李益龙,陆星华,主编.消化内镜学.北京:科学出版社,1995.484~488. 被引量:2
  • 3HORGAN S,PELLENGRINI CA.Botulinum toxin injections for achalasia symptoms[J].Am J Gastroenterology,1999,94:300-301. 被引量:1
  • 4KHAN AA,SHAH SW,ALAM A,et al.Pneumatic balloon dilation in achalasia:a prospective comparison of balloon distention time[J].Am J Gastroenterology,1998,93:1064-1067. 被引量:1
  • 5MAURO MA,KOEHLER RE,BARON TH.Advances in gastrointestinal intervention:the treatment of gastroduodenal and colorectal obstructions with metallic stents[J].Radiology,2000,215:659-669. 被引量:1
  • 6SONG HY,PARK SI,DO YS,et al.Expandable metallic stent placement in patients with benign strictures:results of long-term follow-up[J].Radiology,1997,2003:131-136. 被引量:1
  • 7TAKIMOTO,NAKAMURA T,YAMAMOTO Y,et al.The experimental replacement of a cervical esophageal segment with an artificial prosthesis with the use of collagen matrix and a silicone stent[J].J Thorac Cardiovase Surg,1998,116:98-96. 被引量:1
  • 8PANACCIONE R,GREGOR JC,REYNOLDS RP,et al.Intrasphincteric botulinum toxin versus pneumatic dilatation for achalasia:a cost minimization analysis[J].Gastrointest Endosc,1999,50:492-498. 被引量:1
  • 9柯美云,林杜章.贲门失弛缓症的气囊扩张和药物治疗评价[J].内镜,1990,7(1):2-5. 被引量:7
  • 10邬素珍,杨国玲.食管癌及贲门癌术后吻合口狭窄内镜综合治疗[J].中国内镜杂志,2000,6(2):73-74. 被引量:44

共引文献64

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部