期刊文献+

39例颌骨重建固定钛板取出原因分析 被引量:6

Analysis of 39 Cases with Mandible Reconstruction and Fixation Failure by Using Titanium Plates
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:本文通过39例颌骨因肿瘤或骨折复位开放内固定术后钛板取出原因分析,探讨临床减少或者避免产生上述并发症的可能性。方法:收集因颌骨切除后植入钛板修复重建失败和骨折复位开放内固定术后再入院行钛板取出术共计39例临床病案资料,进行回顾性分析研究。结果:因感染原因取出内置钛板共计22例,其中肿瘤术后重建组14例含放疗后患者8例,骨折内固定组8例。非感染因素取出内置钛板12例,其中肿瘤术后重建组7例,骨折内固定组5例。生理性不适取出5例。钛板取出时间最短为术后3周,最长8年,平均为术后6个月。结论:术后感染是钛板植入后失败取出的主要原因,特别是恶性肿瘤术后放疗更加剧了感染的危险性。钛螺钉松脱或钛板折断移位以及创缘张力过大(裂开)是钛板重建或固定术后感染的直接因素。颌力负担及钛板桡曲力度大小与植入钛板稳固性密切相关。 Objective: To study the possibility to avoid the complications associated with mandibular reconstruction and titanium plates fixation. Methods: 39 patients with mandible reconstruction and titanium plates fixation failure were analysed retrospectively. Results: 22 of the failure were caused by infection, 12 of the failure were caused by plates and screws loosening without infection, and the others were caused by physical discomfort. The average period of titanium plates removal was 6 months postoperative, Conclusion: Infection of the wound is the main cause of the failure of titanium plates, especially irradiation damage. Plates and screws loosening leads to a lack of stability in combination with pre - existing or new infection. Biting force and bending resistance are associated with the plates stability.
出处 《口腔医学研究》 CAS CSCD 2008年第5期554-556,共3页 Journal of Oral Science Research
关键词 钛板 重建 内固定 颌骨 Titanium plates Reconstruction Fixation Mandibular
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Peter Stoll, Rudiger Wachter: AO reconstruction plate systems for the repair of mandibular defects 3 - DBRP versus THORP - systems [J].J Cranio - Maxillo - Facial Surgery, I992, 20( 1 ) : 40 - 45 被引量:1
  • 2王全法,胡文兰,张儒群.颌面部外伤合并上下颌骨骨折治疗临床分析[J].口腔医学研究,2006,22(6):667-667. 被引量:3
  • 3Stoll PW, Bahr R. Wachter: Bridging of mandibular defects using AO - Reconstruction plates 3 - DBRP - versus THORP - system [J].J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 1990, 116(4):707 - 709 被引量:1
  • 4Prein JM. Beyer: Management of infection and nonuion in mandibular fracture[J].Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, 1990, 31(2): 187 -189 被引量:1
  • 5Postlethwaite KR, Philips JG, Booth S, et al. The effects of small plate osteosynthesis on postoperative radiotherapy [ J ]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1989, 27(5):375 被引量:1
  • 6Castillo MH, Button TM, Doer R, et al. Effects of radiotherapy on mandibular reconstruction plates [ J]. Am J Surg, 1988, 156 (3):261 -264 被引量:1
  • 7Eriksson RA, Albrektson T. The effect of heat on bone regeneration [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1984, 42(5):701 -711 被引量:1
  • 8Klotch and Prein.: Mandibular reconstruction using AO plates [J]. Am J Surg, 1987, 154(2):384 -386 被引量:1
  • 9Rainer Schelzeisen, Terry Mcht, Berton Rahn : Further development of titanium miniplate fixation for mandibular fracture. Experience gained and questions raised from a prospective clinical pilot study with 2.0 mm fixation plates [ J ]. J Cranic - Maxillo - Facilial Surgery, 1992, 20(6) : 251 -256 被引量:1
  • 10Ardary. WC: Treatment of mandibular fractures [ J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1989, 47(3) : 1153 - 1157 被引量:1

共引文献2

同被引文献81

引证文献6

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部