期刊文献+

莫西沙星与阿奇霉素对比治疗肺炎支原体感染 被引量:4

Comparative Study of the Curative Effect between Moxifloxacin and Azithromycin on Mycoplasma Pneumoniae-infected Patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价莫西沙星在治疗肺炎支原体感染中的抗菌和抗炎作用。方法采用随机对照方法,以阿奇霉素为对照。共治疗患者36例。莫西沙星组20例,每例静脉注射400mg/d;阿奇霉素组16例,10mg(/kg·d),5~7d后改为口服,共治疗2周。结果莫西沙星组与阿奇霉素组痊愈率分别为85.0%和81.3%,有效率分别为100.0%和93.8%,病原菌清除率均为100%。不良反应发生率分别为5.0%和12.5%。莫西沙星治疗组患者治疗期间体内TNF-α和IL-6水平明显低于同期阿奇霉素治疗组。结论莫西沙星治疗肺炎支原体安全有效,并能降低体内细胞因子水平。 Objective To evaluate the antibacterial and anti-inflammatory effect of Moxifloxacin in Mycoplasma pneumoniae-infected patients. Methods Double-blind randomized study was undertaken to treat 36 patients. 20 cases were intravenous injection with Moxifloxacin (400mg/d),and 16 cases were injected with Azithromycin as control(the oral was used after 10mg/(kg'd) was droped in vein for 5-7 days), totally for 3 courses. Results The curative and the effective rates of Moxifloxacin and Azithromycin were 85.0% and 81.3%, 100.0% and 93.8%, respectively. Bacterial eradication rate was 100% for each drug,the incidence of adverse reactions was 5.0% and 12.5% ,respectively. The TNF-α and IL-6 level in Moxifloxacin group was lower significantly than that of control group. Conclusion Moxifloxacin is effective and safe in the treatment of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection,and it can decrease the cytokine level in vivo.
作者 邢平
出处 《中国现代医生》 2008年第31期6-7,10,共3页 China Modern Doctor
关键词 肺炎支原体 莫西沙星 阿奇霉素 细胞因子 Mycoplasma pneumoniae Moxifloxacin Azithromycin Cytokine
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献20

  • 1石艳红.中西医结合治疗小儿肺炎支原体肺炎76例[J].新中医,2005,37(1):70-71. 被引量:10
  • 2向四国,胡忠金,仰霞.成人肺炎支原体肺炎84例临床分析[J].淮海医药,2006,24(1):41-41. 被引量:3
  • 3Ramirez J A, Mgayen T.Treating community-acqured pneumonia with once- daily gatifloxacin VS twice-daily clarithromycin. J Respir Dis, 1999, 20:s60-69. 被引量:1
  • 4Forrest A, Nix DE,Ballow CH, et al. Pharmacodynamics of intravenous ciprofloxacin in seriously ill patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1993, 37:1073-1081 被引量:1
  • 5Lode H, Borner K, Koeppe P. Pharmacodynamics of fluoroquinolones. Clin Infect Dis , 1998, 27:33-39. 被引量:1
  • 6Dalnoff A. Pharmacodymics of fluoquinolones. J Antimicrob Chemother, 1999, 43:51-59. 被引量:1
  • 7Ruiz-Gonzalez A, Falguera M,Nogues A, et al. Is streptococcus pneumoniae the leading cause of pneumonia of unknown etiology? A microbiologic study of lung aspirates in consecutive patients with community-acquired pneumonia.Am J Med, 1999, 106:385-390. 被引量:1
  • 8Niederman MS, Mandell LA, Anzueto A, et al.Guidelines for the management of adults with community-acquired pneumonia.Diagnosis, assessment of severity, antimicrobial therapy, and prevention. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2001,163:1730-1754. 被引量:1
  • 9Davies BI, Maesen FP. Clinical effectiveness of levofloxacin in patients with acute purulent exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: the relationship with in-vitro activity. J Antimicrob Chemother, 1999, 43 Supple C:83-90. 被引量:1
  • 10DeAbate CA, Russell M, et al. Safety and efficacy if oral levofloxacin versus cefuroxime axetil in acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Respir Care, 1999, 42:206-213. 被引量:1

共引文献52

同被引文献30

引证文献4

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部