期刊文献+

两类可再生能源促进政策的消费者负担比较——国际竞争利益的视角 被引量:4

A Comparison of the Consumer Burden Induced by Two Policies to Promote Renewable Energy——From the Viewpoint of the Interests of International Competition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在可再生能源技术上领先一步关系到一国未来能源产业甚至整体经济竞争力等战略利益,本文试图对现有可再生能源政策推进这个战略利益的能力提供一个评估。我们认为政策的消费者负担是这种能力的一个关键指示,而现有政策可分为"环境类政策"和"专门可再生政策"。我们表明,在对可再生能源提供同等支持时,环境类政策导致的额外消费者负担大大高于专门可再生政策,当前在我国前者是后者的1120倍。这说明,为了获取国际竞争方面的战略利益,必须主要依赖专门可再生政策来推动可再生能源技术走向商业化,而不能依赖环境类政策。 Advanced renewable energy (RE) technologies entails the competitiveness of a nation's future energy industry, or even the competitiveness of its whole economy. This paper attempts to assess the capabilities of the current RE policies in promoting such strategic interests. It is believed that the consumer burden induced by such policies is one of the indicators of such capabilities, and the current RE policies include "environmental policies" and "specialized RE policies". The paper shows that, the support to renewable energy being the same, the extra consumer burden induced by environmental policies is significantly heavier than that caused by specialized RE policies, with the former being 1,120 times the latter. This indicates that, to benefit strategically from the international competition, a nation must depend on specialized RE policies rather than environmental policies to boost the commercialization of RE technologies.
出处 《上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2008年第5期57-64,共8页 Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 可再生能源政策 国际竞争利益 消费者负担 政策评价 RE policies the interests of international competition consumer burden policy assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1[1]Menanteau P.Finon D,Lamy M-L.Prices versus quantities:choosing policies for promoting the development of renewable energy[J].Energy Policy,2003,31(8):799-812. 被引量:1
  • 2[3]Komor P,Bazilian M.Renewable energy policy goals,Programs,and technologies[J].Energy Policy,2005.33(14):1873-1881. 被引量:1
  • 3[4]Berry T,Jaccard M.The renewable portfolio standard:design considerations and an implementation survey[J].Energy Policy.2001,29(4):263-277. 被引量:1
  • 4[5]Mirasgedis S.Impact of social costing on the competitiveness of renewable energies:the case of Crete[J].Energy Policy,2000.28(1):65-73. 被引量:1
  • 5[6]Owen A D.Environmental externalities,market distortions and the economics of renewable energy technologies[J].The Energy Journal,2004,25(3):127-156. 被引量:1
  • 6[8]Fischer C,Newell R.Environmental and technology policies for climate change and renewable energy[Z]//Discussion Paper 04-05.Washingto D.C.:Resources for the Future.2004. 被引量:1
  • 7[9]Jensen S G,Skytte k Simultaneous attainment of energy goals by means of green certificates and emission permits[J].Energy Policy,2003,31(1):63-71. 被引量:1
  • 8[10]Amundsen E S,Mortensen J B.The Danish green certificate system:some simple analytical results[J].Energy Economics.2001.23(5):489-509. 被引量:1
  • 9[11]Morthorst P E.Interactions of a tradable green certificate market with a tradable permits market[J].Energy Policy,2001,29(5):345-353. 被引量:1
  • 10[12]Jensen S G,Skytte K.Interactions between the power and green certificate markets[J].Energy Policy,2002,30(5):425-435. 被引量:1

同被引文献42

引证文献4

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部