期刊文献+

胸水和血清CEA、ADA联合检测对恶性和结核性胸腔积液的诊断价值 被引量:1

Measuring CEA,ADA in Pleural Fluid and Serum Jointly for Differential Diagnosis Between Malignant and Tuberculous Pleural Effusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨联合检测胸腔积液血清中癌胚抗原(CEA)和腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)在恶性和结核性胸腔积液中的诊断价值.方法对48例恶性胸腔积液和156例结核性胸腔积液的胸腔积液和血清ADA、CEA进行定量分析.结果恶性胸腔积液和血清组癌胚抗原(CEA)明显高于结核性胸腔积液和血清组水平(P<0.01);结核性胸腔积液和血清组腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)明显高于恶性胸腔积液和血清组水平(P<0.01);CEA在结核性和恶性胸腔积液中的阳性率分别为5.22%和86.36%,特异性13.64%和94.78%,ADA在结核性和癌性胸腔积液中分的阳性率分别为67.95%和6.25%,特异性93.75%和32.05%.结论胸腔积液和血清ADA、CEA检测对恶性和结核胸腔积液均具有诊断与鉴别诊断价值. Objective To determine the differential diagnosis value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and adenosine deaminase (ADA) measured jointly between malignant and tuberculous pleural effusion. Method ADA and CEA in pleural fluid and serum from 48 patients with malignant pleural effusion and 156 patients with tubeculous were determined. Results The valUe of CEA (pleural effusion/serum) in malignant pleural effusion was significantly higher than in tuberculous pleural effusion (P〈 0.01);While the value of ADA (pleural effusion/serum) in tuberculous was sig- nificantly higher than in malignant pleural effusion/serum. The positive rates of CEA in tuberculous and malignant pleural effusion were 5.22 % and 86.36 % respectively, and the specificity was 13.63 % and 94.78 %. The positive rates of ADA in tuberculous and malignant pleural effusion were 67.95 % and 6.25 % respectively, and specificity was 93. 75 % and 32.05 %. Conclusion The detection of CEA and ADA is of great value in diagosing and differentiating tuberculous pleural effusion from malignant pleural effusion.
机构地区 广州市胸科医院
出处 《吉首大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 2008年第3期125-128,共4页 Journal of Jishou University(Natural Sciences Edition)
关键词 胸腔积液 癌胚抗原 腺苷脱氨酶 诊断价值 pleural effusion CEA ADA diagnosis value
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献32

共引文献107

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部