摘要
法院对待证事实的直接认定,关系到当事人主观举证责任的承担。行政诉讼司法解释证据规则中,对"已经依法证明的事实"范围,并不明确,法官的自由裁量权未免太大,其对诉讼主体侵权的机会也就大大增加。未来统一证据法典中,除规定生效的人民法院裁判文书、仲裁机构裁决文书确认的事实以及有效公证文书所证明的事实可以直接认定外,把有效具体行政行为认定的事实归为"已经依法证明的事实",是行政权之国家权力的体现和要求,同时,明确规定"已经依法证明的事实"之证明要件,使法院对该事实的认定更具有可操作性和统一性,更好地维护当事人的合法权益。
Facts in issue determined by court is related to the parties＇ burden of going forward with the evidence. The scope of facts proved legally in Regulations on Evidence in Administrative Litigation is not clearly described. Therefore, free jurisdiction of judges is powerful to some extent and the chance to the tort of the lawsuit subject increases. In National Uniform Evidence Code to be established in the future, it is of essence that such facts recognized by effective specific administrative act is attributed to facts proved legally apart from the facts found by the awards with legal effect of effective specific administrative act, of notarial documents, can be ascertained directly. And documents for testimony should also be included to make it feasible for the court to recognize the facts as well as to protect the parties＇ legitimate rights.
出处
《江苏工业学院学报（社会科学版）》
2008年第3期26-29,共4页
Journal of Jiangsu Polyetchnic University:Social Science Edition
关键词
司法认知
依法证明
有效的具体行政行为
认定
judicial cognition
effective specific administrative act
recognizing
