期刊文献+

杜鹃花属植物小枝大小对小枝生物量分配及叶面积支持效率的影响:异速生长分析 被引量:48

EFFECTS OF TWIG SIZE ON BIOMASS ALLOCATION WITHIN TWIGS AND ON LAMINA AREA SUPPORTING EFFICIENCY IN RHODODENDRON:AL-LOMETRIC SCALING ANALYSES
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当年生小枝是多年生植物体上最活跃的部分之一,其生物量分配是植物生活史对策研究的一个重要内容。该文采用标准化主轴估计(Standardized major axis estimation,SMA)和系统独立比较分析(Phylogenetically in-dependent contrast analysis,PIC)的方法,研究了杜鹃花属(Rhododendron)植物一年生小枝的大小对小枝叶片、叶柄和茎的生物量分配的影响,以及对叶面积支持效率(即单位质量小枝支持的叶面积)的影响。结果显示:1)小枝大小对叶片生物量分配比率的影响不显著,SMA斜率为1.040(95%的置信区间(CI)=0.998~1.085);但是,小枝越大,叶柄生物量分配比例越高(SMA斜率为1.245,显著大于1.0,呈显著的异速生长关系)。2)小枝越小,单叶面积越小(支持Corner法则),单位质量小枝所支持的叶面积越大,即具有较小枝条和较小叶片的物种可能具有较高的叶面积支持效率。这些结果有助于我们更好地理解亲缘关系十分接近的杜鹃花属植物,在不同生境条件下叶片大小的差异,以及为什么在胁迫生境条件下小叶物种更为常见。 Aims Current-year shoots (twigs) are the most active compartment in plants. Biomass allocation within twigs is an important parameter categorizing plant life history strategies. Our objective was to explain variation in leaf size among habitats and why small-leaved species are more likely to be seen in severe habitats than large-leaved species. Methods Effects of twig size on biomass allocation among lamina, stem, and petiole and on lamina supporting efficiency were estimated using standardized major axis estimation. Correlation between parameters was examined using the phylogenetically independent comparative method. Important findings Fractional lamina mass was found to be independent of twig size, but allometric relationships were found between stem mass and petiole mass and between lamina area and stem mass. Petiole mass increased disproportionally with stem mass, while lamina area failed to keep pace with the increase in stem mass. Species with smaller twigs and smaller leaves may be advantageous in lamina area supporting efficiency over their counterparts.
出处 《植物生态学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第5期1175-1183,共9页 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
基金 国家自然科学基金(30670333)
关键词 小枝 生物量分配 叶面积 异速生长 杜鹃花属 twig, biomass allocation, lamina area, allometric scaling, Rhododendron
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Ackerly DD (1999). Comparative plant ecology and the role of phylogenetic information. In: Press MC, Scholes JD, Barker MG eds. Physiological Plant Ecology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 391-413. 被引量:1
  • 2Ackerly DD, Knight CA, Weiss SB, Barton K, Starmer KP (2002). Leaf size, specific leaf area and microhabitat distribution of chaparral woody plants: contrasting patterns in species level and community level analyses Oecologia, 130, 449-457. 被引量:1
  • 3Ashton PS, Hall P (1992). Comparisons of structure among mixed Dipterocarp forests of Northwestern Borneo. Journal of Ecology, 80, 459-481. 被引量:1
  • 4Bazzaz FA, Grace J (1997). Plant Resource Allocation. Academic Press, San Diego, 1-37. 被引量:1
  • 5Bragg JG, Westoby M (2002). Leaf size and foraging for light in a sclerophyll woodland. Functional Ecology, 16, 633-639. 被引量:1
  • 6Brouat C, Gibemau M, Amsellem L, McKey D (1998). Corner's rules revisited: ontogenetic and interspecific patterns in leaf-stem allometry. New Phytologist, 139, 459-470. 被引量:1
  • 7Chen CD(陈昌笃),Zhuang P(庄平),Hu JC(胡锦矗)(2000). The Research and Protection of Dujiangyan Biodiversity(都江堰生物多样性研究与保护).Sichuan Science and Technology Press, Chengdu, 3. 被引量:1
  • 8Comer EJH (1949). The durian theory or the origin of the modem tree. Annals t~fBotanv, 13,367-414. 被引量:1
  • 9Falster DS, Warton DI, Wright IJ (2006). SMATR: Standardised Major Axis Tests & Routines. Version 2.0, Copyright 2006. http://www.bio.mq.edu.au/ecology/ SMATR/index.html. Cited 10 Oct. 2007. 被引量:1
  • 10Fang MY, Fang RZ, He MY, Hu LZ, Yang HB, David FC (2005). Rhododendron Linnaeus, Sp. P1. 1: 392. 1753. Flora of China, 14, 260-455. 被引量:1

同被引文献749

引证文献48

二级引证文献242

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部