期刊文献+

家庭早期干预对早产儿发育的影响 被引量:5

Effects of family early-intervention on intellectual development in premature infants
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨早期干预对早产儿智能发育的影响。方法:将260例早产儿随机分为早期干预组(130例)和对照组(130例),早期干预组在早产儿出生后即给予抚触、听、视、触觉刺激及按摩和婴儿操综合疗法,同时对家长进行健康教育,患儿出院时指导家长在家中进行抚触、视、听、按摩、婴儿操干预训练。对照组给予常规育儿及常见病预防指导,在3、6、12个月时用北京-Gesll婴幼儿发育检查方法检测干预组与对照组的发育商(DQ)。结果:干预组在适应性、大运动、精细运动、语言和社交5个方面与对照组相比,差异有显著性意义(P<0.01)。结论:家庭早期干预对早产儿在婴幼儿智能发育方面有良好的促进作用,能降低早生儿智能低下的发生率。 Objective: To investigate the effects of family early - intervention on intellectual development in premature infants. Methods: Two hundred and sixty premature infans were randomly divided into early intervention group (n = 130) and control group (n = 130). The intervention group was given touching, massage, vision, hearing, vestibular stimuli and infant exercise by nurses after born in hospital, at same time, their parents were given health education. Afer discharge the parents gave family intervention to their premature infants. The control group was only given instruction of infant care and common disease preservation. Test of Beijing Gesell infant development was used to assess development quotient of premature infans at 3, 6 and 12 month, separately. Results: Compared to control group, in- tervention group had more improvement at adaptability, big campaign, fine campaign, language and social intercourse (P 〈 0.01) . Conclusion: Family early - intervention could promote intellectual development development in premature infants.
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 北大核心 2008年第25期3537-3538,共2页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
关键词 家庭干预 早产儿 智能发育 Family early - intervention Premature infants Intellectual development
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献35

  • 1鲍秀兰,新生儿行为和0~3岁教育,1995年,240页 被引量:1
  • 2鲍秀兰,中国优生优育,1994年,5期,113页 被引量:1
  • 3金汉珍,实用新生儿学,1990年,48页 被引量:1
  • 4Clohety JP, Stark AR. Developmental Supportive Care. Manual of Neonatal Care. (1st ed). Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, 2003, 151-153. 被引量:1
  • 5Hack M, Fanaroff AA. Outcomes of extremely immature infants. A Perinatal dilemma. New England Journal of Medicine, 1993, 329(22):1649-1650. 被引量:1
  • 6Lefebvre R, Glorieux LPS, St Larent-Gagnon T. Neonatal survival and disability rate at age 18 months for infants born between 23 and 28 weeks of gestation. American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 1996, 174(3):833-838. 被引量:1
  • 7Sisson RC. Hazards to vision in the nursery. The New England of Journal of Medicine, 1985, 313(7):444-445. 被引量:1
  • 8Glass p, Avery GB, Kolinjavadi N, et al. Effect of bright light in the hospital nursery. On the incidence of Retinopathy of prematurity. New England Journal of Medicine, 1985, 313(7):401-404. 被引量:1
  • 9Gadeke R, Doring B, Keller F, et al.The noise level in children's hospital and the wake-up threshold in infants. Acta Pediatric Scandinavica, 1969, 58(2):164-170. 被引量:1
  • 10Thomas KA. How the NICU environment sounds to a preterm infant. American Journal of Maternal and Child Nursing, 1989, 14(4):249-251. 被引量:1

共引文献109

同被引文献84

引证文献5

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部