期刊文献+

基于FGA科学图形计量的学科发展研究——以材料科学与工程学科为例

Research on the discipline development based on the FGA graphic scientometrics:A case of the MSE
下载PDF
导出
摘要 科学图形面积比例(FGA)方法,采用科学图形面积占整个文章页面面积的比例作为定量指标,是科学图形计量研究的重要方法之一。本文运用FGA方法进行材料科学与工程学科发展研究,通过对选取的10种期刊进行FGA测量,获得FGA值随时间变化的趋势,并对数据进行整理、分析,以考察材料科学与工程学科的整体发展趋势。研究认为,从20世纪50年代到60年代中后期,材料科学与工程得到了迅速的发展,在经历一个振荡期之后,20世纪末又出现了新的增长势头。我国虽然在材料科学与工程总体发展水平上相对落后于其它发达国家,但是在增长速度上却远远领先。各分支学科发展逐渐平衡,相互交叉、相互融合的趋势明显。 The method of Fractional Graph Area(FGA) ,which is one of the important methods for the graph scientometrics,uses the proportion of the scientific graph area occupying the entire article area as a quantify index. The FGA method is applied as the research on the discipline development of Materials Science and Engineering (MSE). Having ten journals measured, the original data are acquired, the tendency which the FGA changes over time is obtained, and the data is collected and analyzed by means of various statistical methods. Using quantitative and qualitative methods to study trends in the development of MSE, it is indicated that from the 1950s to the late of 1960s, the MSE got a rapid development. After going through a period of oscillation and development, the MSE gains a new growth tendency since the end of the 20th century. Through analyzing the development of MSE among China and abroad, although the development level in MSE of China is relatively behind other developed countries, but the growth rate is far exceeded. By analyzing the development of the various branches of MSE, it is found that the various branches of MSE are developed with more balance pattern, and they will become more intersection and integration.
作者 潜伟 高小扬
出处 《科研管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第4期6-11,共6页 Science Research Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70473004)
关键词 科学计量学 科学图形 FGA 材料科学与工程 scientometrics scientific graph FGA MSE
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献12

  • 1赵红州,蒋国华.科学计量学的历史和现状[J].科学学研究,1984,2(4):26-37. 被引量:30
  • 2[1]Buruno Latour, Steve Woolgar. Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts [M]. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 2nd ed. 1986. 被引量:1
  • 3[2]Buruno Latour. Drawing things together [A]. Michael Lynch, Steve Woolgar. Representation in Scientific Practice [C]. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1990. 19-68. 被引量:1
  • 4[3]Stephen Jay Gould. Ladders and cones: constraining evolution by canonical icons [A]. Robert B Silvers. Hidden History of Science [C]. New York: New York Review of Books, 1995. 37-67. 被引量:1
  • 5[4]Michael Lynch. Discipline and the material form of images: an analysis of scientific visibility[J].Social Studies of Science, 1985, 15 (1): 37-66. 被引量:1
  • 6[5]William Cleveland. Graphs in scientific publications [J]. American Statistician, 1984, 38, 261-269. 被引量:1
  • 7[6]Laurence D Smith. Lisa A Best, Alan Stubbs, et al. Scientific graphs and the hierarchy of the sciences: a Latourian survey of inscription practices [J]. Social Studies of Science, 2000, 30 (1): 73-94. 被引量:1
  • 8[7]Derek J S Price. Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology and non-science [A]. Carnot E Nelson, Donald K Pollack. Communication among Sciences and Engineers [C]. Lexington MA: DC Health, 1970. 3-22. 被引量:1
  • 9[8]Harriet Zuckerman, Robert K Merton. Age, aging and age structure in science [A]. Merton. The Sociology of Science [C]. Chicago IL: the University of Chicago Press, 1973. 479-559. 被引量:1
  • 10刘则渊,刘凤朝.关于知识计量学研究的方法论思考[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2002,23(8):5-9. 被引量:35

共引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部