期刊文献+

对加拿大药品统一审评的分析及其对我国的启示 被引量:2

Analysis of the Canadian Common Drug Review and Its Implication for Chinese Drug Review
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:为优化我国"医保"药品遴选和新药审评提供参考。方法:介绍加拿大药品统一审评人员的职责及审评流程,分析其药品审评中存在的问题及其采取的对策。结果与结论:加拿大为解决药品统一审评中存在的过多的延迟和繁琐、缺乏透明度和责任制等问题,采取了相应的措施,如限定审评时间、开设远程电子会议、建立公众委员会等。我国可借鉴加拿大的相关经验,寻求保证我国"医保"药品遴选和新药审评的经济性、及时性和透明性的途径。 OBJECTIVE: To provide references for optimizing the selection of medical insurance drugs and drug review in China. METHODS: The Canadian common drug reviewers' basic duties and the Canadian common drug review process were introduced, and the existing problems in drug review and the countermeasures were analyzed. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS: In view of the problems occurred in Canadian drug review such as redundant delay and tedious, lack of transparence and job responsibility system and so on, the corresponding measures had been taken such as defining drug review time, helding long range e - meeting, and establishing public committee etc. Chinese common drug review should draw experiences from the Canadian drug review to explore a more economical, timely and transparent practice in Chinese medical insurance drug selection and drug review.
出处 《中国药房》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第25期1921-1923,共3页 China Pharmacy
关键词 加拿大 药品统一审评 中国 启示 Canada Common drug review China Implication
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. CDR Overview [EB/OL]. http ://www. cadth .ca/ index. php/en/cdr/cdr - overview . 2007 - 11 - 1. 被引量:1
  • 2Andreas Laupacis .Economic evaluations in the Canadian common drug review[J].Pharmacoeconomics, 2006,24(11): 1 157. 被引量:1
  • 3Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.Recommendations and status of drug submissions [ EB/OL]. http://cadth. ca/index. php/en/cdr/recom- mendations. 2007- 11 - 1. 被引量:1
  • 4Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. General guidelines for reviewers common drug review process [EB/OL]. http://www. cadth. ca/media/cdr/process/guidelines/CDR % 20General % 20Guidelines % 20for % 20Reviewers % 202006Apr3. pdf . 2006 - 4 - 3.2007 - 11 - 1. 被引量:1
  • 5Ontario Ministry of Health and Long- Term Care. Ontario's transparent drug system for patients act [S]. 2006. 被引量:1

同被引文献21

  • 1顾娟.基于医院技术评估的医用耗材管理探索[J].冶金管理,2021(3):93-94. 被引量:4
  • 2Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, Procedure for Common Drug Review.Ottawa: CADTH, 2011. 被引量:1
  • 3Attaran, A., Cartagena, R., Taylor, A. The Effec- tiveness of the Common Drug Review in Canada's Na- tional Drug Strategy.Halifax, NS: Atlantic Institute for Market Studies, 2011. 被引量:1
  • 4Kallah J. Formulary acceptance: monitoring and evaluation. Provincial Reimbursement Advisor,2006,9: 57-77. 被引量:1
  • 5Rovere M, Skinner B. Access delayed, access de- nied: Waiting for new medicines in Canada. 2009 Report. Vancouver (BC): Fraser Institute,2009. 被引量:1
  • 6Gamble JM, Weir DL, Johnson JA, et al. Analysis of drug coverage before and after the implementation of Canada's Common Drug Review. CMAJ, November 22, 2011, 183(17). 被引量:1
  • 7Gregoire JP, MacNeil P, Skilton K, et al. In- ter-provincial variation in government drug formularies. Can J Public Heahh,2001,92:307-312. 被引量:1
  • 8Angus DE, Karpetz HM. Pharmaceutical policies in Canada. Issues and challenges.Pharmacoeconomics 1998,14(Suppl 1):81-96. 被引量:1
  • 9Anis AH, Guh D, Wang XH. A dog's breakfast: prescription drug coverage varies widely across Canada. Med Care,2001,39:315-326. 被引量:1
  • 10Demers V, MeloM, JackeviciusC, et al. Compari- son of provincial prescription drug plans and the impact on patients' annual drug expenditures. CMAJ 2008,178 (4):405-409. 被引量:1

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部