期刊文献+

急性多发性与单发性腔隙性脑梗死危险因素差异的探讨 被引量:8

Study on different risk factors of acute multiple and single lacunar infarction.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨急性多发性腔隙性脑梗死(acute multiple lacunar infarction,AMLI)与急性单发性腔隙性脑梗死(acute single lacunar infarction,ASLI)危险因素的差异及其临床意义。方法:比较AMLI患者(AMLI组,62例)与ASLI患者(ASLI组,237例)的危险因素差异,并对有差异的因素进行多因素Logistic回归分析。结果:AMLI组中有心房颤动及重度颈内动脉狭窄2项危险因素的例数明显多于ASLI组,多因素Logistic回归分析显示,上述2项危险因素与AMLI均呈正相关而与ASLI无明显相关性。结论:重度颈内动脉狭窄和心房颤动与AMLI有关,提示这2项危险因素在AMLI的发病中可能起重要作用。 Objective : To study the difference and clinical significance in the risk factors of acute multiple lacunar infarction (AMLI) and acute single lacunar infarction(ASLI). Methods: 62 patients with AMLI were assigned to the AMLI group, 237 patients with ASLI were assigned to the ASLI group. The risk factors were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis was carried out in the differential risk factors of two groups. Results: There were more numbers of atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and severe stenosis of internal carotid artery (ICA) in AMLI group than that in ASLI group. Logistic regression analysis showed that AF and severe ICA had direct correlation to AMLI but had no relation to ASLI. Conclusion: AF and severe ICA are related to AMLI suggesting that these two risk factors have significant effect on the pathogenesis of AMLI.
出处 《新医学》 北大核心 2008年第8期504-506,共3页 Journal of New Medicine
关键词 腔隙性脑梗死 急性多发性腔隙性脑梗死 急性单发性腔隙性脑梗死 颈内动脉狭窄 心房颤动 Lacunar infarction Acute multiple lacunar infarction Acute single lacunar infarction Stenosis of internal carotid artery. Atrial fibrillation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1CASO V, BUDAK K, GEORGIADIS D, et al. Clinical significance of detection of multiple acute brain infarcts on diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging [J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2005, 76 (4): 514-518. 被引量:1
  • 2SEIFERT T, ENZINGER C, STORCH M K, et al. Acute small subcortical infarctions on diffusion weighted MRI: clinical presentation and aetiology [J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2005, 76 (11): 1520-1524. 被引量:1
  • 3肖波,柳茵.脑血管病常用的影像学检查及其临床价值[J].新医学,2006,37(7):484-486. 被引量:2
  • 4WARDLAW J W. What causes lacunar stroke? [J] J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2005, 76 (5): 617-619. 被引量:1
  • 5ARAUZ A, MURILLO L, CANTUC, et al. Prospective study of single and multiple lacunar infarcts using magnetic resonance imaging: risk factors, recurrence, and outcome in 175 consecutive cases [J]. Stroke, 2003, 34 (10): 2453-2458. 被引量:1
  • 6TEJADA J, DIEZ-TEJEDOR E, HERNXNDEZ-ECHEBARRIA L, et al. Does a relationship exist between carotid stenosis and lacunar infarction? [J] Stroke, 2003, 34 (6): 1404-1409. 被引量:1
  • 7饶丽芬,钟依平,肖敏,岑雪卿,张慧珠.老年人颈内动脉狭窄血压变化及对脑梗塞的影响[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2007,28(B06):79-80. 被引量:2
  • 8WESSELS T, ROTTGER C, JAUSS M, et al. Identification of embolic stroke patterns by diffusion-weighted MRI in clinically defined lacunar stroke syndromes [ J ] . Stroke, 2005, 36 (4) : 757-761. 被引量:1

二级参考文献4

  • 1杨松娜,孙宁玲,马玉良.血压昼夜节律与颈动脉病变关系的探讨[J].北京医学,2006,28(4):209-211. 被引量:8
  • 2North America Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Methods, patients characteristics and progress [J]. Stroke, 1991,22 (6):711-720. 被引量:1
  • 3ZENCHETI'I A, BOND M G, HENNIG M, et al. Risk factors associated with alterations in carotid intima-media thickness in hypertension: baseline data from the European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis[J].J Hypertens, 1998,16(7):949-961. 被引量:1
  • 4MURATA T, TAKAHASHI T, OMORI M, et al. Association of abnormal diurnal blood pressure variation with the development of silent cerebral infarction in patients with late-life-onset depression [J]. Gen Hosp Psychiatry, 2003,25 (4):298-300. 被引量:1

共引文献2

同被引文献42

引证文献8

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部