摘要
透过迪昂-奎因论点的历史演变,可以清晰展现出科学论证模式的变化。在迪昂之前,判决性实验被看作是科学的指路牌,其对应的是归纳科学模式;此后,迪昂论点对应的是整体论的科学论证模式;奎因论点对应的则是强硬科学论证模式。上述梳理展现出,伴随着迪昂论点与奎因论点的转变,论证模式和理论选择的标准同样发生转换。
The historical change of Duhem-Quine thesis can exhibit the transformation of scientific argumentation mode.Before Duhem,critical experimentation is regarded as the scientific fingerpost,which is in accompany with induction mode;then Duhem thesis is in accordance with holistic scientific argumentation mode;and Quine thesis is in correspondence with strong scientific argumentation mode.In all,in the turn from Duhem thesis to Quine thesis,all the scientific argumentation mode is also keeping changing and the standard of theoretical choice has been transformed accordingly.
出处
《科学技术与辩证法》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第4期59-62,共4页
Science Technology and Dialectics
