期刊文献+

单增李斯特菌不同PCR快速检测方法比较 被引量:17

Comparison of three rapid PCR methods for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较3种PCR快速检测方法在检测单核细胞增生李斯特菌时的特异性和灵敏度方面的差异。方法针对单核细胞增生李斯特菌的毒力基因iap和prfA基因,分别设计引物,进行单个PCR、多重PCR、套式PCR等3种方法检测。结果3种PCR方法均具有较强的特异性;套式PCR的灵敏度为102cfu/ml,高于单个PCR(103cfu/ml)和多重PCR(104cfu/ml)。结论多重PCR在特异性检测方面具有优势,而在灵敏度方面,套式PCR要明显优于单个及多重PCR方法。 Objective To investigate the differences among the three fast- detect PCR methods in their specificity and sensitivity for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes (LM). Methods Based on the sequence of LM virulence gene lap and prfA, five pairs of primers were designed for each of the three PCR. Results All the primers showed high specificity. The sensitivity of the nested- PCR got as high as 102 cfu/ml, which was more sensitive than the single- PCR (103 cfu/ml) and the multiplex - PCR(104 cfu/ml). Conclusion Multiplex - PCR has more advantages in specificity. However, nested - PCR was more sensitive than single - PCR and multiplex - PCR obviously. Therefore, the primary health and quarantine departments should choose a suitable method according to their situations and the purpose of supervision work.
出处 《中国公共卫生》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第8期1021-1023,共3页 Chinese Journal of Public Health
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(30500025) 教育部211重点学科项目资助 华中师范大学大学生创新性实验项目
关键词 单核细胞增生李斯特菌 单个PCR 多重PCR 套式PCR 特异性 灵敏度 Listeria monocytogenes single PCR multiplex PCR nested PCR specificity sensitivity
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献40

  • 1焦新安,刘秀梵,张如宽.李斯特氏菌属特异单抗试剂的研制与鉴定[J].中国畜禽传染病,1994,16(6):17-19. 被引量:11
  • 2[3]Swaminathan B,Feng P.Rapid Detection of FoodBorne Pathogenic Bacteria[J].Annu Rev Microb,1994,48:401-426. 被引量:1
  • 3[4]De Boer E,Beumer,R R.Methodology for Detection and Typing of Foodborne[J].Microorganisms.Internat J Food Microb,1999,50:119-130. 被引量:1
  • 4[6]Walter E,Hill,Atin R,Datta,et al.Chapter 24.Identification of Foodborne Bacterial Pathogens by Gene Probes[M].Bacteriol Analy Manu Online(FDA-CFSAN),2001,1. 被引量:1
  • 5[7]Lampel A K,Orlandi P A,Kornegay L.Improved Template Preparation for PCR-Based Assays for Detection of Foodborne Bacterial Pathogens[J].Appl Environ Microb,2000,66:4539-4542. 被引量:1
  • 6[8]Ramesh A,Padmapriya B P,Chrashekar A,et al.Application of a Convenient DNA Extraction Method and Multiplex PCR for the Direct Detection of Staphylococcus aureus and Yersinia enterocolitica in Milk Samples[J].Mol Cell Probes,2002,16:307-314. 被引量:1
  • 7[9]Cohen H J,Mechanda S M,Lin W,et al.PCR Amplification of the fimA Gene Sequence of Salmonella typhimurium,a Specific Method for Detection of Salmonella spp[J].Appl Environ Microb,1996,62(12):4303-4308. 被引量:1
  • 8[10]Mahon J,Lax A J.A Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Method for the Detection in Avian Faeces of salmonellas Carrying the SpvR Gene[J].Epidemiol Infect,1993,111(3):455-464. 被引量:1
  • 9[11]Guo X,Chen J,Beuchat L R,et al.PCR Dectection of Salmonella Enterica Serotype Montevideo in and on Raw Tomatoes Using Primes Derived from hilA[J].Appl Environ Microb,2000,66(12):5248-5252. 被引量:1
  • 10[12]Sharma N K,Rees C E D,Dodd C E R.Development of a Single Reaction Multiplex PCR Toxin Typing Assay for Staphylococcus aureus Strains[J].Appl Environ Microb,2000,66(4):1347-1353. 被引量:1

共引文献91

同被引文献212

引证文献17

二级引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部