摘要
目的:比较序贯疗法和常规静脉滴注法治疗支气管肺炎的临床疗效。方法:将70例小儿支气管肺炎随机分为序贯疗法组36例和静脉滴注法组34例,观察两组疗效。结果:序贯疗法组痊愈69.4%(25/36),显效19.4%(7/36),进步11.1%(4/36),无效0例,总有效率88.9%(32/36)。静脉滴注组:痊愈73.5%(25/34),显效17.6%(6/34),进步8.8%(3/34),无效0例,总有效率91.6%。两组在治疗效果、总有效率上无显著性差异(t=2.94,P>0.05);序贯疗法组住院时间(6.0±0.9)d与静脉滴注组(8.0±1.5)d比较有显著性差异(t=7.92,P<0.01)。序贯疗法组总疗程(10.6±1.4)d与静脉滴注组(10.0±1.3)d比较无显著性差异(t=1.94,P>0.05)。结论:序贯治疗能节省治疗费用、降低院内交叉感染、减轻患儿痛苦。
Objective：To compare sequential therapy and conventional intravenous infusion treatment of the clinical effect of bronchopneumonia. Methods：70 cases of bronchopneumonia in children were randomly divided into sequential therapy group （n=36）and intravenous infusion group （n=34）,the effects were observed. Results： The sequential therapy group recovery 69.4%（25/36）,effective 19.4%（7/36）,improvement 11.1%（4/36）,invalid 0,and the total efficiency rate is 88.9% （32/36）. Intravenous infusion group：73.5% recovery（25/34）,effective 17.6% （6/34）,improvement 8.8%（3/34）,invalid 0,and the total efficiency rate is 91.6%.and there is no significant difference （t=2.94,P〉0.05） in the total efficiency and overall treatment time between the two group, there is significant difference in the duration of hospitalization between the two group. Conclusion：The sequential therapy treatment can save costs ,reduce hospital cross-infection and reduce pain in children with bronchopneumonia.
出处
《中国医药导报》
CAS
2008年第21期47-48,共2页
China Medical Herald
关键词
序贯治疗
支气管肺炎
小儿
Sequential therapy
Bronchopneumonia
Children
