摘要
1991年的旧著作权法规定:"按照工程设计、产品设计图纸及其说明进行施工、生产工业品,不属于本法所称的复制。"而2001修正后的新著作权法则删除了此规定,从新法条文的表面文义看,复制是否扩展到"平面到立体",并不十分明确,因而引发较大的争议。以两则案例为切入点,就上述问题从法律条文、海外经验、法理等方面进行论证分析,由此得出:对于"平面到立体"是否属于著作权法意义上的复制问题,不能一概而论,要视具体的著作权客体而定,可把著作分为两大类,一为美术作品,如绘画、书法、照片等;二为图形作品,如电路图、产品设计图纸等科技或工程设计图。在进行立体转换时,前者可认定构成著作权法意义上的复制,而后者则不构成。
The term ＂reproduction＂ as used in Copyright Law of 1991 does not cover the construction or manufacture of industrial products on the basis of drawings of engineering designs and product designs, and descriptions thereof. However, the Copyright Law of 2001 does ＇nt contain the article, which arouse some dispute. From the analysis of two case and oversea experience, we could found that it should be determined by the object of copyright to judge the essence of the construction or manufacture. Copyright works should be divided into two kinds that contains art works and engineering designs works. If the manufacture of products on the basis of art works, which would be deemed to reproduction. Engineering designs works were in reverse action.
出处
《时代法学》
2008年第4期91-96,104,共7页
Presentday Law Science
关键词
异形转换
复制
平面
立体
heteromorphism transform
reproduction
plane
solid
