摘要
一百年前的甲骨文发现,是中国文化史上的重要事件。但是对于甲骨文发现者是谁、何时发现、通过什么途径发现等基本问题,并没有定于一尊的说法。目前学术界关于甲骨文发现主要有两种说法形成对峙之势,即由王懿荣在京城吃中药发现说和王襄、孟定生在天津首先发现说的争论。两种说法互不相能,常有激烈争论之举发生。本文在概括甲骨文发现研究诸说之后,对两派观点进行了评议,认为两者并不是非此即彼的尖锐矛盾,而是可以同时并存;两种说法都有可取之处,但也都存在一些亟待解决的问题。
The discovery of oracle bone inscriptions over 100 years ago was an important event in the history of Chinese culture. But some basic questions are still in dispute, such as who the discoverer was, when and by which ways it was discovered. Currently, there are two main opposing views about the discovery of oracle bone inscriptions in the academic circle, one view is that Wang Yi-rong discovered it when he took traditional Chinese medicine in Beijing; the other one is that it was firstly discovered by Wang Xiang and Meng Ding-sheng in Tianjin. Debates occurred frequently. Summarized the different opinions, a comment about both viewpoints is made in this paper to argue that they are inclusive rather than exclusive; they are both advisable though each has some burning questions.
出处
《邯郸学院学报》
2008年第2期58-64,共7页
Journal of Handan University
关键词
甲骨文
发现
王懿荣
王襄
评议
oracle bone inscriptions
discovery
Wang Yi-rong
Wang Xiang
comment
