期刊文献+

中国系统评价研究的状况调查 被引量:2

The survey on current situation of system evaluation in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨中国系统评价研究的相关情况。方法对1996-2006年中国所有期刊杂志中的系统评价进行检索,并分析结果。结果中国近十年来共刊登相关文献646篇,其中系统评价291篇,系统综述13篇,Meta分析264篇,荟萃分析78篇。刊载的系统评价文献数量逐年递增,由1999年的1篇激增到2006年的208篇,内容涉及到整个医学生物领域的理论、应用、调查等方面。其中应用类的质量评价为Ⅰ级,即采用最佳证据(随机对照试验)的文献为343篇,占该类文献的60.39%。护理方面的文献共9篇,占所有文献的1.39%。结论系统评价发展迅速,中国正处于将循证医学中的系统评价引入实践的阶段,并取得了一定成绩,然而发展中尚存在一些难点、盲点,系统评价(尤其是护理领域)的相关研究数量和质量均有待进一步提高。 Objective To explore the current situation of system evaluation in China. Methods The system evaluation in all Chinese periodical and magazines were indexed from 1996 to 2006, and the results were analyzed. Results There are 646 published pieces about system evaluation in the latest ten years in China. The published systematic review document increased year by year, sharply from 1 piece in 1999 to 208 pieces in 2006, while the contents involve every aspect of medicine biology. 343 pieces of these documents using the best evidence, the randomized controlled trial, account for 60.39% of all. There are 9 pieces nursing documents, only occupying 1. 39%. Conclusions The system evaluation is developing rapidly in China. We are now on the stage of putting the systematic review of the Evidence-based medicine into practice. Though, we achieve some success, there are still some difficulties and blind spots in its development, and the quantity and quality of correlated investigation in system evaluation, especially in nursing field, are waiting for further boost.
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2008年第10期1149-1152,共4页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
关键词 系统评价 系统综述 META分析 调查 Systematic review System evaluation Meta-analysis Survey
  • 相关文献

同被引文献17

  • 1李廷谦,刘雪梅,张鸣明,马建昕,杜亮,周宇丹,常静,王蕾,杨晓楠,王刚,张颖.中文期刊发表的中医药系统评价/Meta分析现状调查[J].中国循证医学杂志,2007,7(3):180-188. 被引量:43
  • 2Shea B J, Bouter LM, Peterson J, et al . External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews(AMSTAR) [ J ]. PLoS ONE,2007,2(12) :e1350. 被引量:1
  • 3Higgins Jl, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.0.2 [ updated September 2009 ] [ M ]. Chinchester:John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 被引量:1
  • 4Comell J'E, Laine C. The Science and Art d Deduction: Complex Sys- tematic Overviews[J]. Ann Intern Med,2008,148(10):786-782. 被引量:1
  • 5Higgim , Green S. Cochrance Handbook for Systematic Re- views of Interventions Version 5.1.0. [ EB/OL]. (2011-03-01 ) 2013-05-16 . http ://www. cochrane-handbook, cochraneorg. 被引量:1
  • 6Brian H Willis,Muireann Quigley. The Assessment of the Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses in Diagnostic Research:a Systematic Review[J].Med Res Meth,2011,(11):163. 被引量:1
  • 7Moher D,Liberati A,Tetzlaff J. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses:The PRISMA State-ment[J].{H}PLOS MEDICINE,2009,(06):e1000097. 被引量:1
  • 8Xiong Y. Quality Appraisal of Domestic Reports of Systematic Re-views[J].J Nurs Sci,2010,(12):80-82. 被引量:1
  • 9陈耀龙,李幼平,杜亮,王莉,文进,杨晓妍.医学研究中证据分级和推荐强度的演进[J].中国循证医学杂志,2008,8(2):127-133. 被引量:232
  • 10张俊华,商洪才,张伯礼.系统评价和meta分析质量的评价方法[J].中西医结合学报,2008,6(4):337-340. 被引量:54

引证文献2

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部