摘要
针对马恒通先生有关图书馆学研究对象的分析、评判及其"馆藏知识的传播"问题提出不同看法,认为学科"研究对象"很难用一个为大家普遍认同、一致的"标准"固定不变:"研究对象"之争,源于主体在观照事物时存在宏观与微观的不同视角,可以继续探索与争鸣:"馆藏知识传播论"并未准确地揭示图书馆活动的本质,也不是图书馆学研究对象的终结。
There are different views against Mr. Ma Hengtong＇ s analysis and evaluation about the study object of library science and his view about ＂ the communication of the collections knowledge＂. Like many other subjects, library science is also difficult to be fixed in it＇ s study object with an accepted generally or a same ＂standard＂. The controversy about ＂study object＂ is due to macro and micro perspectives. The study object of library science is not only can be further explored, but also is needed to further exploring, ＂The collections knowledge communication theory＂ does not accurately reveal the nature of library activities, and it is not the end of library science study object.
出处
《图书情报工作》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第7期148-150,共3页
Library and Information Service
关键词
图书馆学
研究对象
争论
视角
“馆藏知识的传播”
library science research object debate perspective ＂the communication of the collections knowledge＂
