摘要
目的比氧气雾化吸入与超声雾化吸入对婴幼儿支气管肺炎的疗效。方法将160例支气管肺炎患儿随机分为氧气雾化组（氧气组）和超声雾化组（超声组）各80例，两组雾化药物及其他治疗相同。结果氧气组症状／体征改善时间较超声组缩短（P〈0．05，P〈0．01）。两组雾化吸入中HR、RR，较雾化前显著增快（均P〈0．05），超声雾化吸入中SpO2较雾化吸入前、吸入后1小时显著降低（均P〈0．05）；氧气组雾化治疗不良反应如哭闹、治疗中止发生率显著低于超声组（均P〈0．05）。结论氧气雾化吸入治疗对支气管肺炎患儿刺激性小，患儿耐受性好，提高治愈率，提高护士工作效率，优于超声雾化吸入。
Objective To compare the effect of oxygen aerosol and ultrasound aerosol inhalation for bronchial pneumonia in infants. Methods One hundred-sixty cases of bronchial pneumonia were randomly divided into oxygen aerosol group and ultrasonic aerosol group, every group was 80 cases, the aerosol drugs and other therapeutic programmes were the same. Results The symptoms and physical signs were much more quickly improved in oxygen group than in uhrasound group （P 〈0.05, P 〈0.01）. As aerosol inhalation the HR and RR much faster （P 〈0.05） in all cases, but in ultrasound group the SpO2 depressed （P 〈0.05）. the adverse reactions such as crying, stopped treatment were significantly lower in oxygen group than in the ultrasound group （P 〈0.05）. Conclusion Oxygen aerosol inhalation for infants with pneumonia is superior to ultrasound aerosol inhalation and can increase the cure rate and improve the efficiency of nursing.
出处
《实用心脑肺血管病杂志》
2008年第4期276-279,共4页
Practical Journal of Cardiac Cerebral Pneumal and Vascular Disease
