摘要
目的:探讨溶栓疗法对急性心肌梗死后再发心绞痛的影响。方法:将52例急性心肌梗死早期溶栓治疗后心绞痛发生情况与52例急性心肌梗死后未溶栓者心绞痛发生情况进行对比。结果:心绞痛在溶栓组发生率为36.5%,非溶栓组发生率为44.2%。2组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:急性心肌梗死患者早期静脉溶栓治疗不能防止急性心肌梗死后再缺血。
Objective To discuss the influence of dissolved cork treatment for again angina pectoris in the acute myocardial infarction. Method Fiftytwo cases with acute myocardial infarction, which appeared angina pectoris early dissolved cork treatment were compared with 52 cases with acute myocardial infarction which appeared the angina pectofis non - dissolved cork treatment. Results The incidence rate of angina pectoris was 36.5% in dissolved cork group and 44.2% in non-dissolved cork group. The comparison of the two groups had no statistics significance （P 〉 0.05）. Conclusion The early dissolved cork treatment for acute myocardial infarction can not prevent again ischemia after acute myocardial infarction.
出处
《吉林医学》
CAS
2008年第11期898-899,共2页
Jilin Medical Journal
关键词
急性心肌梗死
溶栓
心绞痛
Acute myocardial infarction
Dissolved cork
Angina pectoris
