期刊文献+

胡适两部文学史的缺失 被引量:1

Hu Shih's Two Histories of Literature:Their Shortcomings
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《国语文学史》、《白话文学史》的基本观点与思路形成于胡适对文学革命的酝酿、倡导时期,实际上它们又是胡适为自己"文学工具革命"的主张在构建历史依据,在做合理性阐发;正因为出于这样的目的,两部文学史有着明显的"六经注我"倾向,也就使得两部文学史在客观性、科学性上存在诸多缺失。 The basic points of view and lines of thoughts in Hu Shih's A History of Chinese Literature and History of Vernacular Literature were formed in the period of deliberating and promoting literary revolution. In the two works Hu Shih attempted to set up his historical basis for his claim of the "revolution of literary tools" and reasonably expounded this basis. Just out of this purpose in the two works there is a striking tendency of "Six classics annotate my point of view" and thereby, there exist various shortcomings in terms of objectiveness and scientificity in the two works.
作者 尹康庄
出处 《深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第3期110-114,共5页 Journal of Shenzhen University:Humanities & Social Sciences
关键词 《国语文学史》 《白话文学史》 文学工具革命 简单化 主观化 A History of Chinese Literature A History of Vernacular Literature revolution of literarytools simplified subjectivism
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1胡适著..白话文学史[M].天津:百花文艺出版社,2002:365.
  • 2胡明.胡适传论[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1996.. 被引量:17
  • 3胡适自传[M].南京:江苏文艺出版社,1995. 被引量:3
  • 4洪治纲主编.胡适经典文存[M].上海:上海大学出版社,2004. 被引量:1
  • 5胡适.中国新文学大系·建设理论集[M].上海:上海文艺出版社,1981(影印本). 被引量:1
  • 6胡适著..国语文学史[M].合肥:安徽教育出版社,2006:160.

共引文献18

同被引文献22

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部