期刊文献+

对《天问》与《史记》所述三代史的异同比较

A Comparison of Similarities and Dissimilarities of Tian Wen's and Shi Ji's Historical Recounts of the Three Dynasties of Xia,Shang and Zhou
下载PDF
导出
摘要 司马迁曾读屈原的《天问》,而且可能还解说过,应该说司马迁与屈原对三代史的认识大体相同。但是通过研读《天问》和《史记》中所述夏、商、周三代史,发现二者虽然在创作意图上基本相似,但是在材料来源、对天命观的认识等方面却大多相异,甚至相左。 Si Maqian read Tian Wen by Qu Yuan and might give some explanations for that. It can be argued that Si Maqian and Qu Yuan had similar understanding of the history of the three dynasties of Xia, Shang and Zhou. However, after reading the historical accounts of the three dynasties in Tian Wen and Shi Ji, we have found that the two works are basically similar in writing intentions, but that the two are quite dissimilar and conflicting in material sources and in the understanding of the view of kismet.
作者 董常保 熊刚
机构地区 阿坝师专中文系
出处 《成都理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2008年第2期30-33,共4页 Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences
关键词 屈原 《天问》 司马迁 《史记》 三代史 Qu Yuan Tian Wen Si Maqian Shi Ji history of three dynasties of Xia, Shang and Zhou
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1[11]司马迁.史记[M].北京:中华书局,1956. 被引量:3
  • 2陈子展.楚辞直解[M].南京:江苏古籍出版社,1988. 被引量:5
  • 3洪兴祖.楚辞补注[M].北京:中华书局,1981. 被引量:5
  • 4班固著..汉书1一[M].北京:中华书局,1962:154.
  • 5范晔著..后汉书 12[M].上海:上海中华书局,1965:143.
  • 6[8]山海经[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1989. 被引量:4
  • 7[3]国语[M].上海:上海书店,1987. 被引量:4
  • 8[4][清]梁玉绳.史记志疑[M].北京:中华书局,1981. 被引量:4

共引文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部