期刊文献+

受虐儿童父母个性特征及其情感表达方式 被引量:5

Preliminary Study on Parental Personality Traits and Affective Expression in Abuse Children
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨受虐儿童父母个性特征及其情感表达方式。方法在河南新乡某3个自然村,共1310户,其中家有10-15岁儿童共370户,随机抽取200户,采用儿童受虐筛查表、艾森克个性问卷(EPQ)、多伦多述情障碍表(TAS),对儿童进行受虐筛查表施测,并对父母中主要养育者进行EPQ、TAS评估。对196份有效问卷进行独立样本t检验、χ^2检验。结果受虐组与非受虐组父母的受教育年限为(7.75±5.437)岁vs(7.28±2.532)岁,二组比较无显著性差异(P=0.413)。二组父母的年龄分别为:父亲(36.16±8.96)岁vs(39.06±7.99)岁(P=0.170);母亲(36.06±5.15)岁vs(37.62±5.70)岁(P=0.121)。监护人身份受虐组父亲31例,母亲49例;非受虐组父亲为35例,母亲81例,经统计学处理无显著性差异(χ^2=1.56P=0.212)。受虐与非受虐组父母的精神病倾向[t(父亲)=1.221P=0.227;t(母亲)=-0.471P=0.639],内、外向[t(父亲)=-0.449P=0.655;t(母亲)=-0.859P=0.392],神经质[t(父亲)=-0.524P=0.602;t(母亲)=-0.556P=0.579],掩饰度[t(父亲)=-1.263P=0.211;t(母亲)=0.733P=0.465],描述情感的能力[t(父亲)=0.946P=0.348;t(母亲)=0.815P=0.417],认识和区分情感与躯体感受的能力[t(父亲)=0.215P=0.831;t(母亲)=2.107P=0.037],幻想[t(父亲)=-0.088P=0.930;t(母亲)=-0.971P=0.333],外向性思维[t(父亲)=-0.648P=0.519;t(母亲)=-0.164P=0.870],差异均无统计学意义。结论对儿童进行虐待行为的父母并非存在人格问题及情感表达方面的障碍,对儿童进行施虐不仅是病态父母的行为,正常父母也可能存在。 Objective To explore the parental personality traits and affective expression in abuse children. Methods The investigation was carried out in 3 villages in Xinxiang, Henan province, with a total of 1 310 households, of which there were altogether 370 households that had children at 10 - 15 years old. From them ,200 households were randomly selected to screen the children for child abuse, and the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ) and Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS) assessment were made among the parents who were primary caregivers. Independent samples t - test and Chi -square test were conducted to the 196 valid questionnaires. Results The average educated years of parents in abuse group and non - abuse group were (7.75± 5. 437 ) years old and ( 7.28± 2. 532 ) years old, there was no significant difference (P = 0.413 ). The average age of fathers in abuse group and non - abuse group were (36.16 ±8.96) years and ( 39.06 ± 7.99 ) years repectively, there was no significant difference ( P = 0. 170 ) , and those of mothers in both groups were ( 36.06 ± 5.15 ) years and ( 37.62 ± 5.70) years respectively,there was no significant difference( P =0. 121 ). There were 31 fathers and 49 mothers who were guardian in abuse group, while there were 35 fathers and 81 mothers in non - abuse group ( Χ^2 = 1.56 P = 0.212 ). No significant differences were found in parentalpsychoticism It(father) =1.221 P= 0.227;t (mother) = -0.471 P=0.639],neuroticism[t (father) = -0.524 P=0.602;t (mother) = - 0. 556 P = 0. 579 ] ,extraversion/introversion[ t (father) = - 0. 449 P = 0. 655 ;t(mother) = - 0. 859 P = 0. 392 ] and lie [ t ( father ) = - 1. 263 P = 0.211 ; t (mother) = 0. 733 P = 0. 465 ], the ability to identify and describe feelings [ t (father) = 0. 946 P = 0. 348 ;t( mother) =0.815 P=0.417] ,to distinguish between bodily sensations[t(father) =0.215 P=0. 831;t(mother) =2. 107 P= 0.037] ,to daydream It(father) = -0.088 P=0
出处 《实用儿科临床杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第10期785-787,共3页 Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics
基金 河南省教育厅项目资助(2007-GH-096) 新乡医学院博士启动基金资助
关键词 儿童 受虐 精神卫生 父母 个性特征 横断面调查 child, abuse mental health parent personality traits cross - sectional study
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献56

共引文献72

同被引文献61

引证文献5

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部