期刊文献+

2型糖尿病血清LDL-C均相酶法测定与Friedewald估算比较 被引量:2

Determination of average phase detection of low density lipoprotein in serum of type 2 diabetes patients and comparison with Friedewald formula
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较均相酶法直接测定与Friedewald公式计算法估算2型糖尿病人血清低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)的变异性并与健康对照组比较。方法分别用均相酶法直接测定和F公式计算糖尿病人和正常人血清LDL-C含量,配对t检验分别比较两种方法在两组人群中的差别。结果在糖尿病人中,当1.8mmol/L≤TG<5.81mmol/L时两种方法有显著差异(P<0.001),当TG<1.8时,两种方法所得LDL-C值差异无显著性(P=0.203)。健康人群中当1.80mmol/L≤TG<5.03mmol/L时,两种方法无显著性差异(P=0.844),TG≤1.8mmol/L时,两种方法有显著性差异(P<0.001)。结论Friedewald公式计算法在健康人群和糖尿病人LDL-C测定时应用条件不同,建议用均相酶法直接测定LDL-C更适合临床应用。 Objective To compare the variability of the homogenous enzymatic determination and calculated estimation by Friedewald Formula in Low Density Liportein Cholesterol (LDL -C ) detection in T2DM patients' serum, and the difference with the healthy controls. Methods LDL - C both in T2DM patients and healthy controls were determined by the homogenous enzymatic assay and calculated estimation of F formular respectively. T Test was used to detect the variability. Results In normal people, when 1.80mmol/L≤TG 〈5.03 mmol/L, there was no significant difference between direct results and estimations ( P = 0.844). There was difference when TG 〈 1.8mmol/L ( P 〈 0. 001 ). In grow T2DM, the average result of Friedewald Formula was higher than direct determination despite the level of TG. When 1.80mmol/L≤TG 〈 5.82mmol/L, there was significant difference between direct results and estimations (P 〈 0. 001 ). While TG 〈 1.80mmol/L, there was no significant difference (P = 0. 203). Conclusion Regarding the levels of TG, there are different methods for determination of LDL - C in of healthy people and T2DM patients. It is suggested that direct homogenous enzymatic determination of LDL - C is suitable for chnical purpose.
出处 《中国热带医学》 CAS 2008年第4期587-589,共3页 China Tropical Medicine
关键词 低密度脂蛋白胆固醇 2型糖尿病 酶均相法 FRIEDEWALD公式 Homogenous Enzymatic Measurement Friedewald Formula LDL- C T2DM
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献18

  • 1陈灏珠.实用内科学(第10版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1998.1765-1767. 被引量:321
  • 2吕礼应.LDL-C直接测定与间接计算的比较[J].上海医学检验杂志,1997,12:67-67. 被引量:1
  • 3Miller M. Current perspectives on the management of hypertriglyceridemia. Am Heart J, 2000,140: 232-240. 被引量:1
  • 4Cole TG, Klotzsch SG, McNamara JR . Measurement of triglyceride concentration. In: Rifai N, Warnick GR, Dominiczak MH, eds. Handbook of lipoprotein testing. Washington : AACC Press, 2000.207-219. 被引量:1
  • 5Malloy MJ, Kane JP. A risk factor for atherosclerosis: triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. Adv Intern Med , 2001 , 47:111-136. 被引量:1
  • 6Stein EA, Myers GL. National Cholesterol Education Program recommendations for triglyceride measurement: executive summary. Clin Chem , 1995,41:1427-1433. 被引量:1
  • 7Holani KK, Miller WG, Waymack PP. Robustness of three triglyceride reagents for matrix effects of proficiency testing . Clin Chem , 1993,39:1126-1128. 被引量:1
  • 8Klotzsch SG , McNamara JR . Triglyceride measurements: A review of methods and interferences. Clin Chem , 1990,36 : 1605-1613. 被引量:1
  • 9Eberly LE, Stamler J, Neaton JD .Relation of triglyceride levels, fasting and nonfasting, to fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease. Arch Intern Med,2003,163:1077-1083. 被引量:1
  • 10Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel Ⅲ). JAMA, 2001,285: 2486-2497. 被引量:1

共引文献52

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部