期刊文献+

丁卡因润滑剂对小儿拔除喉罩麻醉深度的影响 被引量:3

The impact of tetracaine lubricant on the depth of anesthesia in removal of laryngeal mask airway in children
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:以50%和95%小儿平稳拔除喉罩的呼气末七氟烷浓度(EC50和EC95)为指标确定拔除喉罩的麻醉深度,并观察1%丁卡因润滑剂对小儿拔除喉罩麻醉深度的影响。方法:选择全麻下行单侧腹股沟斜疝修补手术的小儿患者50例,ASAⅠ级,年龄2~5岁,体重10~20kg,随机分为两组(n=25),观察组喉罩表面涂抹含1%丁卡因的液体润滑剂,对照组喉罩表面涂抹不含局麻药的水溶性润滑剂。吸入七氟烷和氧化亚氮诱导并维持麻醉,术中不使用肌肉松弛剂及静脉麻醉药物,手术结束后维持设定的七氟烷浓度15min后拔除喉罩。根据Dixon序贯法确定拔除喉罩的七氟烷浓度,每0.2%七氟烷浓度为一个增减单位。拔除喉罩时患儿没有出现咳嗽、牙关紧闭、体动、屏气及喉痉挛等认为平稳拔除喉罩。结果:观察组患儿平稳拔除喉罩的呼气末七氟烷EC50值为1.23%(95%CI1.11%~1.34%),EC95值为1.46%(95%CI1.34%~2.34%);对照组患儿平稳拔除喉罩的呼气末七氟烷EC50值为1.73%(95%CI1.61%~1.88%),EC95值为2.01%(95%CI1.86%~3.07%)。结论:喉罩表面涂抹1%丁卡因润滑剂后,小儿平稳拔除喉罩的呼气末七氟烷EC50和EC95值分别下降了28.9%和27.4%。 Objective To investigate the effects of 1% tetracaine lubricant on the depth of anesthesia that is determined by the EC50 and EC95 values of sevofurane in the reposeful removal of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in children. Methods Fifty ASA I pediatric patients aged 2 - 5 years undergoing unilateral inguinal hernioplasty were randomly assigned to receive a LMA with either lubricant containing 1% tetracaine (experimental group) or lubricant alone (control group) on its surface. Only mixed inhalation of sevoflurane and 50% nitrous oxide was administered for induction and maintenance of anesthesia. The target concentration of sevoflurane was maintained for 15 min postoperatively and then LMA was removed. Each target concentration at time of removal was predetermined by the Dixon's up-and-down method, with 0.2% sevoflurane as an adjusted unit. The removal of LMA was considered successful when no coughing, teeth clenching, restlessness, breath holding, or laryngospasm occurred. Results The EC50 value of sevoflurane in the reposeful removal of LMA was 1.23% in the experiment group (95%CI 1.11% -1.34%) and 1.73% in the control group (95%CI 1.61% - 1.88%) while the EC95 value was 1.46%(95%CI 1.34% - 2.34%) and 2.01%(95%CI 1.86% - 3.07%), respectively. Conclusion Application of 1% tetracaine lubricant on LMA reduces the EC50 and EC95 values of sevoflurane by 28.9% and 27.4% respectively in the removal of LMA.
出处 《实用医学杂志》 CAS 2008年第10期1798-1800,共3页 The Journal of Practical Medicine
关键词 丁卡因 儿童 七氟烷 喉罩 麻醉深度 Tetracaine Child Sevoflurane Laryngeal mask airway Anesthesia depth
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1熊志添,黄河山,许学兵.喉罩在麻醉和气道管理中的地位[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2002,22(8):508-511. 被引量:198
  • 2Drage M P, Nunez J, Vaughan R S, et al. Jaw thrusting as a clinical test to assess the adequate depth of anaesthesia for insertion of the laryngeal mask [ J ]. Anaesthesia, 1996,51 (5) : 1167-1170. 被引量:1
  • 3Dixon W J. Staircase bioassay:the up-and-down method [J]. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 1991,15( 1 ) :47-50. 被引量:1
  • 4Laffon M, Plaud B, Dubousset A M, et al. Removal of laryngeal mask airway :airway complications in children, anaesthetised versus awake [ J ]. Paediatr Anaesth, 1994,4 ( 1 ) : 35 -37. : 被引量:1
  • 5Gataure P S, Latto I P, Rust S, et al. Complications associated with removal of the laryngeal mask airway : a comparison of removal in deeply anaesthetised versus awake patients [J]. Can J Anaesth, 1995,42(6) : 1113-1116. 被引量:1
  • 6Kitching A J, Walpole A R, Blogg C E, et al. Removal of laryngeal mask airway in children: anaesthetised compared with awake [J]. Br J Anaesth, 1996,76(4) :874-876. 被引量:1
  • 7O'Neill B, Templeton J J, Caramico L, et al. The laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients:factors affecting ease of use during insertion and emergence [J]. Anesth Analg, 1994,78(3):659-662 被引量:1
  • 8Chan S T, Med M, Tham C S. The effects of 2% lignocaine gel on incidence of retching with the use of the laryngeal mask airway [J]. Anaesthesia, 1995,50(2) :257-258. 被引量:1
  • 9Spahr-Schopfer I A, Bissonnette B, Hartley E J. Capnometry and the paediatric laryngeal mask airway [J]. Can J Anesth, 1993,40 (5) : 1038-1043. 被引量:1

二级参考文献10

  • 1Bapat PP,Verghese C.Laryngeal mask airway and the incidence of regurgitation during gynecological laparoscopies[].Anesthesia and Analgesia.1997 被引量:1
  • 2Matta BF,Marsh DS,Nevin M.Laryngeal mask airway: a more successful method of insertion[].Journal of Clinical Anesthesia.1995 被引量:1
  • 3Brimacombe J,Keller C,Scully M.Laryngeal mask usage in the unstable neck[].Anesthesia and Analgesia.1999 被引量:1
  • 4Cheong YP,Park SK,Son Y,et al.Comparison of incidence of gastroesophageal reflux and regurgitation associated with timing of removal of the laryngeal mask airway: on appearance of signs of rejection versus after recovery of consciousness[].Journal of Clinical Anesthesia.1999 被引量:1
  • 5Gataure PS,Latto IP,Rust S.Complications associated with removal of the laryngeal mask airway: a comparison of removal in deeply anaesthetized versus awake patients[].Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia.1995 被引量:1
  • 6Malins AF,Cooper GM.Laparoscopy and the laryngeal mask airway[].British Journal of Anaesthesia.1994 被引量:1
  • 7Godsiff L,Magee L,Park GR.Propofol versus propofol with midazolam for laryngeal mask insertion[].European Journal of Anaesthesiology.1995 被引量:1
  • 8Goodwin AP,Rowe WL,Ogg TW.Day case laparoscopy.A comparison of two anaesthetic techniques using the laryngeal mask during spontaneous breathing[].Anaesthesia.1992 被引量:1
  • 9Georgiou L,Bousoula M,Spetsaki M.Combined thoracic epidural and general anaesthesia with laryngeal mask airway for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a patient with myasthenia gravis[].Anaesthesia.2000 被引量:1
  • 10Nakazawa K,Hikawa Y,Maeda M,et al.Laryngeal mask airway insertion using propofol without muscle relaxants: a comparativestudy of pretreatment with midazolam or fentanyl[].European Journal of Anaesthesiology.1999 被引量:1

共引文献197

同被引文献28

  • 1Martin LR,Gilsanz F,Rodrigo J,et al.Conventional stepwise vslvital capacity rapid inhalation induction at two concentrations of sevoflurane[J].Eur J Anaesthesiol,2004,21(4):265-271. 被引量:1
  • 2Wu ZL.Analysis of recovery characters after general anesthesia in 40 children[J].Suzhou University J Med Sci,2006,26(3):531-532. 被引量:1
  • 3Murat I,Constant I,Maudhuy H.Perioperative anaesthetic morbidity in children:a database of 24.165 anaesthetics over a 30-month period[J].Pediatr Anaesth,2004,14(2):158-166. 被引量:1
  • 4Hui H,Na L,Zhun CJ,et al.Therapeutic experience from 1 428 patients with pediatric tracheobmnehial foreign body[J].Pediatr Surg,2008,43(4):718-721. 被引量:1
  • 5Inomata S,Yamashita S,Toyooka H,et al.Anaesthetic in duction time for tracheal intubation using sevoflurane or halothane in children[J].Anaesthesia,1998,53(5):440-445. 被引量:1
  • 6Moore JK,Moore EW,Elliott RA,et al.Propofol and halothane versus sevoflurane in paediatric day case surgery:induction and recovery characterlstics[J].Br J Anaesth,2003,90(4):461-466. 被引量:1
  • 7Wu ZL. Analysis of recovery characters after general anes-thesia in 40 children[J].Suzhou University J Med Sci,2006,(03):531-532. 被引量:1
  • 8Hui H,Na L,Zhun CJ. Therapeutic experience from 1428 patients with pediatric tracheobmnehial foreign body[J].Pediatr Surg,2008,(04):718-721. 被引量:1
  • 9Inomata S,Yamashita S,Toyooka H. Anaesthetic in duction time for tracheal intubation using sevoflurane or halothane in children[J].{H}ANAESTHESIA,1998,(05):440-445. 被引量:1
  • 10Moore JK,Moore EW,Elliott RA. Propofol and hal-othane versus sevoflurane in paediatric day case surgery:induction and recovery characterlstics[J].{H}British Journal of Anaesthesia,2003,(04):461-466. 被引量:1

引证文献3

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部