摘要
目的借鉴国外先进教育方式,推进我国合理用药教育战略的实施。方法文献研究法、统计学方法。结果参与式方法与一般宣教方法在提高用药知识水平上的差异有统计学意义;在干预效果持续方面,参与式方法在干预结束后一个月的用药知识水平与基线情况相比,差异仍有统计学意义,而一般宣教方法同期用药知识水平则与基线无显著性差异。结论参与式培训方法在达到预期干预效果和保持干预效果方面,均较一般培训方式优越。参与式培训方法的推广,对进一步推进合理用药教育具有重要意义。
Objective To use the foreign advanced educational mode for reference and promote the practice of the educational strategy for RUD in our country. Methods Literature review, statistics Results There is significant difference between the participative mode and the common mode （ t = 2. 102, P = 0.038 ） ; in the aspect of lasting effect, there is significant difference between the baseline period and the period of a month after the ending of the participative training （ t = 2.713, P = 0.007 ）, while no significant difference between the baseline period and the period of a month after the ending of the training by the way of common mode （ t = 0.240, P = 0.811 ）. Conclusions Participative training is better than the common training in the aspects of training outcome and lasting effect. Popularizing the participative training will bring great effect in promoting the education of RUD.
出处
《医学与社会》
2008年第5期16-18,共3页
Medicine and Society
