期刊文献+

对寻衅滋事罪之“强拿硬要”的司法认定 被引量:1

A Judicial Determination on Defiance and Affray Crime of Taking away Forcefully
下载PDF
导出
摘要 由于寻衅滋事罪与其他犯罪在构成要件上存在一定程度的重合,其行为方式"强拿硬要"与抢劫罪、敲诈勒索罪的手段行为区分并不明显,因而在司法实践中往往对其难以把握,造成了执法上的一定困难。但寻衅滋事罪之"强拿硬要"在主观犯意、客观罪责上与侵财型犯罪存在显著区别,所以,对其进行认定时应当遵循主客观相统一的原则,同时还应考量该行为情节程度上的入罪限制。 Because of the existence of a certain degree of coincidence between defiance and affray crime and other criminal elements, it is difficult to grasp their behavior in judicial practice and there is no clear distinction between acts, these cause the enforcement of certain difficulties. However, the crime of creating trouble "to forcefully take away" dolus subjective, objective responsibility for the crime and other types of crime against property were significantly different from the way for the offence of "forcefully take away" seize. The unity should be guided by the principle of the objective and subjective, consideration the extent of the circumstances of the crime restrictions.
出处 《河南公安高等专科学校学报》 2008年第3期59-61,共3页 Journal of Henan Public Security Academy
关键词 “强拿硬要” 主观犯意 客观罪责 入罪限制 "Take away forcefully" Subjective dolus Objective guilt Convicted restrictions
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1(日)西原春夫著,顾肖荣等译..刑法的根基与哲学[M].北京:法律出版社,2004:145.
  • 2张明楷著..刑法学 第2版[M].北京:法律出版社,2003:977.
  • 3储槐植著..刑事一体化与关系刑法论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1997:530.
  • 4陈兴良著..刑法哲学[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1997:705.

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部