摘要
葛兰西的"实践哲学"以重申马克思主义哲学的实践本体论基础为反思支点,批判"正统"马克思主义,引发了西方马克思主义的文化批判转向;但是,在争夺文化领导权的文化批判中,葛兰西实现的是社会历史主体—社会历史客体的模式构想,其实质是近代哲学主体—客体建制模式在社会历史话语中的"翻版",社会历史实践的本体论基础又仅仅成为一个外在的"设定"。这为真正恢复马克思主义哲学社会历史实践本体论变革的实质和路向,提供了重要启示。
Gramsci＇s practical philosophy reiterated the foundation of Marxist practical ontology as a point of departure for reflection in order to criticize ＂orthodox＂ Marxism, which gave rise to the cultural critiques of western Marxism. However, in the cultral critiques aimed at leadership of culture, what Gramsci realized is the model of social historical subject-social historical object, that is, a top-down indoctrination of the organic intellectuals as social historical subject to the proletariat as social historical object. The focus is the subjectivity of the social historical subject, which is in essence another version of the modern philosophical model of subjet-object in social historical discourse. In this way, the foundation of ontology of social historical practice becomes but an external ＂set＂. This offers important implications for really restore the essence and approach of social historical practical ontology of Marxist philosophy.
出处
《教学与研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第5期50-56,共7页
Teaching and Research
基金
2005年国家社会科学基金项目"西方马克思主义批判理论的困境和出路"(项目编号:05CZX002)的阶段成果
中国博士后科学基金资助
关键词
实践哲学
实践本体论基础
社会历史主体一社会历史客体
practical philosophy
foundation of practical ontology
social historical subject-social historical object
