期刊文献+

可执行体系结构分析与评估研究 被引量:1

Research on Executable Architecture Analysis and Evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对体系结构缺乏有效的分析、评估方法,提出了基于可执行体系结构的分析、评估方法。该方法将体系结构分析分为静态分析和动态分析,静态分析以分析体系结构数据一致性、数据完整性及数据合法性、数据变更影响,以及数据挖掘为主,说明各种分析方法的内涵及效果;动态分析将可执行体系结构动态特征分为三个方面:时间相关分析、资源相关分析及可靠性相关分析,这三个方面分别描述了体系结构执行的动态特征,并为可执行体系结构评估提供依据。可执行体系结构评估从三个层次说明了体系结构的评价标准,将体系结构评估从定性评估推进到具体的定量评估,为体系结构的合理指导实践提供可靠依据。 Aiming at that architecture lacks effective analysis and evaluation method, this paper puts forward an executable architecture based one. The method divides architecture analysis into static analysis and dynamic analysis. The static analysis mainly analyzes architecture data consistency, architecture data integrity and data validation, architecture data change impact and data mine and explains each analysis method's meanings and effects; the dynamic analysis categorizes executable architecture characteristics into three areas: time-related analysis, resource-related analysis and reliability-related analysis. These three areas separately describe the dynamic characteristics of architecture execution and provide the basis for executable architecture evaluation. Executable architecture evaluation explains architecture evaluation criteria from three layers, pushes architecture evaluation from qualitative analysis to quantitative analysis, and provides reliable basis for guiding practice.
出处 《中国电子科学研究院学报》 2008年第3期256-261,共6页 Journal of China Academy of Electronics and Information Technology
基金 复杂信息系统功能建模 优化与验证方法项目(70601036)
关键词 可执行体系结构 体系结构分析 体系结构评估 executable architecture architecture analysis architecture evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献25

  • 1王君英,段广洪.基于IDEF0的CIMS底层控制Petri网模型的自动生成方法[J].自动化学报,1997,23(3):400-403. 被引量:15
  • 2C^4ISR Architecture Working Group C4ISR Architecture Framework Version 2.0[R]. Department of Defense, 1997. 被引量:1
  • 3Kazman R,et al. Scenario-Based Analysis of Software Architecture[J]. IEEE Software, 1996,13(6) :47-55. 被引量:1
  • 4Smith C. Williams L. Software Performance Engineering..A Case Study Including Performance Comparison with Design Alternatives[J]. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1993, 19(7):720-741. 被引量:1
  • 5Kazman R,Klein M,et al. The Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method [C],Proceedings of ICECCS,Monterey ,CA, 1998 : 68-78. 被引量:1
  • 6Kazman R,Barbacci M,et al. Experience with Performing Architecture Tradeoff Analysis [C], Proceedings of ICSE99, (Los Angeles, CA ), 1999: 54-63. 被引量:1
  • 7C4ISR ITF Integrated Architecture Panel. C4ISR Architecture Framework Version 1.0[R]. The United States:Department of Defense, 1996. 被引量:1
  • 8C4ISR Architecture Working Group. C4ISR Architecture Framework Version 2.0 [R]. The United States: Department of Defense, 1997. 被引量:1
  • 9DoD Architecture Framework Working Group. DoD Architecture Framework, Version 1.0[R]. The United States: Department of Defense, 2003,1. 被引量:1
  • 10Alexander H. Levis. Executable Models of C4ISR Architectures [OL]. Online, http:∥viking. gmu. edu/workshop/CPN-Architectures2. pdf, 2000. 被引量:1

共引文献28

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部