期刊文献+

基于不同性能目标的RC结构抗震设计的效益分析 被引量:21

Benefit analysis of RC structures designed under different performance objectives
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对不同的建筑抗震设防类别和性能目标(小震丙类、小震乙类、"中震不屈服"和"中震弹性"),对框架结构和框架-剪力墙结构进行抗震设计。以小震丙类建筑为基准,比较按小震乙类建筑、"中震不屈服"和"中震弹性"设计时,结构地震效应和抗震措施的差别所引起的构件截面尺寸与配筋(即工程量)的变化。分析表明:①按中震设计时结构的楼层位移约为按小震设计时的2 ̄3倍。②框架结构:6度、7度区按不同性能目标设计,工程增加量都在10%以内;8度区,工程量增加很多,尤其是按"中震弹性"设计,混凝土和钢筋增加量都超过40%。③框架-剪力墙结构:6度区,只有按乙类建筑设计时,用钢量增加很多,约为82.0%;7度区,按中震性能目标设计时,用钢量增加很多,尤其是按"中震弹性"设计时,剪力墙截面非常大,实用性和经济性均较差。④《建筑抗震设计规范》中,对不同设防水准下的不同结构所规定的抗震措施(包括构造措施)具有重要意义。在低烈度区,单纯依靠提高设计地震作用进行设计,并不能达到提高结构抗震安全的目的;除非结构的重要性要求提高抗震设防类别,一般情况下,对结构的关键部位和关键构件采用性能设计,更为经济有效。 Seismic design of frame structure and frame-shear wall structure was carried out with different performance objectives(frequent seismic design of class C,frequent seismic design of class B,non-yielding design under moderate earthquake and elastic design under moderate earthquake).The changes in sizes of component section and rebar quantities were compared between the structures designed as class C under frequency earthquake and the same structures designed according to class B under frequency earthquake,non-yielding under moderate earthquake and elastic under moderate earthquake.The analysis indicated that: ①the building displacement under moderate earthquake was 2-3 times of that under frequency earthquake.② for frame structures,in level 6 or 7 seismic protection areas,the increase in project quantity was not within 10%,while the concrete and rebar quantity were increased by over 40% in the seismic area of protection intensity 8.③ for frame-shear wall structures,in seismic area of intensity 6,the quantity of reinforced bar was increased by about 82.0% only when designed as class B under frequent earthquake,while the quantity increase was large when designed under moderate earthquake in seismic area of level 7,and especially so for elastic design under moderate earthquake.④ it is important for the seismic fortification measures in the seismic design code consider different performance levels.It is not possible to achieve a higher seismic performance only by increasing the designing seismic force;it is economical and practical to apply performance-based design to the critical parts and members in common structures,unless higher seismic protection is required in view of the importance of structures.
出处 《土木工程学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第3期37-45,共9页 China Civil Engineering Journal
基金 建设部《建筑抗震设计规范》(GB50011-2001)修订课题
关键词 性能目标 “中震弹性”设计 “中震不屈服”设计 乙类建筑 丙类建筑 工程量 performance objective elastic design under moderate earthquake non-yielding design under moderate earthquake structure of class B structure of class C quantity
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1GB50223-2004.建筑工程抗震设防分类标准[S].[S].,.. 被引量:26
  • 2GB50011-2001.建筑抗震设计规范[S].[S].,.. 被引量:2211
  • 3王亚勇,戴国莹著..建筑抗震设计规范疑问解答[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2006:161.
  • 4黄嘉,韦锋,杨红,白绍良.钢筋混凝土乙类建筑抗震设计思路探讨[J].重庆建筑大学学报,2004,26(1):55-61. 被引量:7
  • 5王亚勇.我国2000年工程抗震设计模式规范基本问题研究综述[J].建筑结构学报,2000,21(1):2-4. 被引量:55
  • 6Priestley M J N, Kowalsky M J. Direct displacement-based seismic design of concrete buildings [J]. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 2000, 33(4): 421-444 被引量:1
  • 7周锡元.抗震性能设计与三水准设防[J].土木水利(台湾),2003,30(5). 被引量:11
  • 8Federal Emergency Management Agency. NEHRP Recom mended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Build ings and Other Structures, Partl-Provisions, FEMA368[ R ].Washington, DC:Federal Emergency Management A gency, 2000 被引量:1
  • 9prEN 1998 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance[ S].Draft 6, 2003 被引量:1
  • 10Otani S, Hiraishi H, Midorikawa M,et al. New seismic design provisions in Japan [C]//Proc. of International Conference on Advanced Technologies in Design, Construction and Maintenance of Concrete Structures. Farmington Hills:ACI,2001:1-10 被引量:1

二级参考文献26

  • 1GB50010-2002.混凝土结构设计规范[S].[S].,.. 被引量:2648
  • 2GB50011-2001.建筑抗震设计规范[S].[S].,.. 被引量:2211
  • 3ATCAO Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Conctete Buildings[R]. Applied Technology Council, 1996. 被引量:1
  • 4FEMA 273 NEHRP Guidelines for seismic Rehabilitation of buildings [R]. Federal Emergency Management Agency,1997. 被引量:1
  • 5SEAOC Vision 2000 a Framework for Performance-based Engineering [ R]. Structural Engineering Association d California,1995. 被引量:1
  • 6BSSC (1998) NEHRP Recommended provisions for seismic regulation of new buildings and other structures[R]. Report No: FEMA302, Washington, D. C. 被引量:1
  • 7FEMA 368 (2000) NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures [ R]. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C. 被引量:1
  • 8FEMA 355 (2000) State of the art report on connection performance [ R ]. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D. C. 被引量:1
  • 9FEMA 356 (2000) Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings [R]. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D. C. 被引量:1
  • 10ICC (2003) Performance Code for Buildings and Facilities, International code council, 2003. 被引量:1

共引文献3081

同被引文献105

引证文献21

二级引证文献124

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部