期刊文献+

从现金红利看第一大股东对高级管理层的监督 被引量:18

The Largest Shareholder’s Monitoring on Management’s Cash Dividend Policy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文旨在考察大股东和高管在现金红利中的不同动机。以1999-2004年度的全部A股上市公司为样本,检验公司高级管理层对现金红利的影响,考察第一大股东发放现金股利的动机,并分析第一大股东对管理层的监督和控制。我们发现,当董事长兼任总经理(二职合一)时,公司发放的现金红利较低;当董事会中管理层比例较高时,公司发放的现金红利也较低;但当第一大股东控股比例较高时,公司的现金红利则较高。进一步研究发现,第一大股东的控股能够削弱二职合一对红利的负面影响,也能够削弱董事会中管理层比例对现金红利的负面影响。本文的经验结果支持了代理理论和大股东降低代理成本假说,即公司管理层普遍不愿进行现金派送,但是大股东能够监督管理层的红利政策;而且大股东的控股比例越高,这种监督作用越明显,越能够缓解代理问题对红利政策的影响。本文的研究结果具有较强的政策意义,即股权分置改革的后期,不一定要急于过度分散股权结构,当大股东和高管分属不同主体时,适度的股权集中有利于对管理层的监督。 This study concerns about the different incentives of controlling shareholder and management in cash dividend policies. Different from previous studies, we examine this issue based on board structure and ownership concentration data and thus obtain quite different results. Using all the A-share companies from year 1999 to 2004 as a sample, this paper examines management's influence on cash dividend, analyzes the largest shareholder's incentive in cash dividend, and explore the largest shareholder's monitoring toward management. It shows that, firms with a combined title of board chair and CEO (CMB) tend to have lower cash dividends, firms that have higher managerial membership on the board tend to pay lower cash dividends, and firms that have higher ownership concentration tend to pay higher cash dividends. This study further shows that the largest shareholder's controlling rights tend to weaken the association between CMB and lower cash dividends; it also shows that higher controlling rights of the largest shareholder tends to weaken the association between managerial membership on the board and lower cash dividends. Taken together, this paper supports the agency theory and monitoring role of the largest shareholder: managements are reluctant to pay cash dividends, but the largest shareholder can monitor the managements' dividend policy; Still, shareholding of the largest shareholder may conduce to the effectiveness of the monitoring and assuage agency cost. This study provides insightful political implications: by making the previous non-tradable stateowned shares to be tradable, the split share structure reform tends to align the interest of controlling shareholders and minority share- holders. In the subsequent reforms, however, it is not rational to diversify the shareholding excessively. Once the largest shareholder and management are of different entities, it is more efficient to let the largest shareholder to dominate the board and monitor the behavior of senior managements.
作者 张海燕 陈晓
出处 《南开管理评论》 CSSCI 2008年第2期15-21,共7页 Nankai Business Review
关键词 二职合一 第一大股东 现金股利 代理理论 Combined Title of Board Chair and CEO the Largest Shareholder Cash Dividend Agency Theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Brav, Alon, J. R. Graham, C. R. Harvey, R. Michaely. Payout Policy in the 21st Century, NBER, Working Paper, 2003. 被引量:1
  • 2吕长江,周县华.公司治理结构与股利分配动机——基于代理成本和利益侵占的分析[J].南开管理评论,2005,8(3):9-17. 被引量:141
  • 3Berle, A., G. Means. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: MacMillan, 1932. 被引量:1
  • 4Jensen, M. C., W. H. Meckling. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost, and Capital Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, (3): 305-360. 被引量:1
  • 5Fenn, G. W., N. Liang. Corporate Payout Policy and Managerial Stock Incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 2001, (60): 45 -72. 被引量:1
  • 6Jensen, M. C.. Agency Cost of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 1986, (76): 323-329. 被引量:1
  • 7Jensen, M. C.. The Eclipse of the Public Corporation, Harvard Business Review, 1989, (67): 61-74. 被引量:1
  • 8Tenev, Stoyan, C. L. Zhang, L. Brefort. Corporate Governance and Enterprise Reform in China. Washington: World Bank/ IFC, 2002: 1-104. 被引量:1
  • 9田志龙.董事长、总经理兼任与分立的比较研究[J].管理现代化,1997,17(6):25-28. 被引量:10
  • 10Easterbrook, Frank. Two Agency Cost Explanations of Dividends, American Economic Review, 1984, (74): 650-659. 被引量:1

二级参考文献94

  • 1李增泉,孙铮,王志伟.“掏空”与所有权安排——来自我国上市公司大股东资金占用的经验证据[J].会计研究,2004(12):3-13. 被引量:986
  • 2韩德瑞 秦朵.动态经济计量学[M].上海人民出版社,1998.. 被引量:3
  • 3管汝平.股份回购的管理[J].上市公司,1999,(5). 被引量:1
  • 4原红旗.[D].,1998年. 被引量:1
  • 5廖继锋 华雪.《公告追踪:目击五粮液2000年度股东大会》[N].《证券时报》,2001年2月21日. 被引量:1
  • 6刘峰 贺建刚.《股权结构与大股东利益实现方式的选择—中国资本市场利益输送的初步研究》:工作论文[Z].中山大学现代会计与财务研究中心,2003年.. 被引量:1
  • 7同济大学 上海证券(联合)课题组.《我国上市公司股权制衡研究》,上证联合研究计划第四期课题报告[Z].,2002年.. 被引量:1
  • 8Zhao, Y. Q., 2000, "Dividend Payment and Ownership Structure in the Chinese Stock Market", Asia - Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics (7), 129--141. 被引量:1
  • 9Conroy, Eades and Harris, 2000, "A Test of the Relative Pricing Effects of Dividends and Earnings: Evidence from Simultaneous Announcements in Japan", Journal of Finance LV P1199--1997. 被引量:1
  • 10Asquith and Mullins, 1983, "The Impact of Initiating Dividends Payments on Stockholders' Wealth", Journal of Business 56. P77-- 96. 被引量:1

共引文献1098

同被引文献341

引证文献18

二级引证文献194

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部