摘要
目的:探讨腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)与传统阑尾切除术(CA)的优缺点。方法:回顾性分析2003年4月~2007年4月,按意愿随机进行LA和CA的120例阑尾炎患者的临床资料。结果:两组手术时间无差异(P>0.05),住院费用相似(P>0.05),腹腔镜组住院时间短(P<0.05),术后并发症少。结论:与CA比较,LA具有创伤小、恢复快、并发症少等优点,是一种安全、理想的手术方式。
Objective: To explore the merits and defects of laparoscopic appendectomy(LA)and those of conventional ap pendectomy(CA).Methods:120 cases were performed LA or CA at random. The clinical data of two methods were summarized and contrasted from April 2003 to April 2007.Results: There was no deference between two methods in the mean operative time and the mean expenditure. LA had much less mean postoperative hospital stay and rate of complications than CA.Conclusion:It is no doubt that LA have many advantages obviously compare with CA. LA has advantages of little invasion, rapid recovery and fewer complications,it is a safe and ideal surgical alternative.
出处
《中国医药导报》
CAS
2008年第9期42-43,共2页
China Medical Herald