摘要
现行国家赔偿归责标准已经无法适应日益复杂的国家侵权现实。实践中暴露出了对"违法"含义的不同理解、实际可操作性不强、不符合一般的侵权责任原理、不能够适应国家职权行为实际范围以及过于侧重对国家机关行为的法律评价等问题。要解决国家赔偿归责领域的这些问题,就必须构建起行政执法行为适用违法或过错归责原则、行政事实行为适用过错归责原则、刑事司法行为适用结果归责标准、公共设施致人损害赔偿责任适用危险责任归责原则、国家合法行为造成损害适用公平原则的多元化归责体系。
Current criterion of liability fixation on state compensation has been incommensurate to increasingly complex fact of state tortious. Several problems have manifested in practice such as divergently comprehending the illegality, being lack of feasibility, not conforming to the general doctrine of liability fixation, not accommodating to the actual limits of state function, and emphasizing particularly on legal estimate of the conduct of state organs. A plural system of liability fixation should be established to resolve the problems mentioned above： the principle of liability with wrongs or illegality applies to the administrative law enforcement acts and administrative factual acts, the criterion of liability for result to the criminal judicial acts, the doctrine of liability for danger to the damages caused by public establishment, and the equitable principle to the damages of legal state acts.
出处
《国家检察官学院学报》
CSSCI
2008年第2期116-122,共7页
Journal of National Prosecutors College
关键词
违法责任
过错责任
结果责任
公平责任
state compensation doctrine of liability fixation liability with illegality liability for wrongs liability for result equitable liability
