期刊文献+

邓肯E-ν模型与E-B模型的比较 被引量:21

Comparison of Duncan's E-ν and E-B models
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为探讨邓肯E-ν模型和E-B模型的差异,首先利用糯扎渡堆石料的两种模型参数计算各自模型所反映的泊松比,并进行了比较分析;然后对两种模型自身理论公式所反映的泊松比的差异进行分析;最后,以261.5 m高的糯扎渡心墙坝为例,进行了有限元计算,研究两种模型计算得到的坝体内不同位置处的应力水平、弹性模量和泊松比的差异,进一步认识了两种模型的差异。 For investigation of the difference between Duncan' s E-ν and E-B models, the parameters of the two models for roekfill of Nuozadu Dam were used for calculation of different Poisson's ratios reflected by the two models. Then, the difference between the Poisson' s ratios reflected by the theoretical formulas of the two models was analyzed. Finally, finite element analysis was perfortrmed of the Nuozadu core rockfill dam of 261.5m in height. The stress level and Young' s modulus at different locations of the dam body and the difference between Poisson' s ratios calculated by the two models were studied, and the differences between the two models were further investigated.
出处 《水利水电科技进展》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第1期4-7,共4页 Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources
基金 国家自然科学基金(50579014) 国家自然科学基金委员会、二滩水电开发有限责任公司雅砻江水电开发联合基金(50639050)
关键词 E-ν模型 E-B模型 三轴试验 泊松比 心墙堆石坝 糯扎渡水电站 E-ν model E-B model triaxial test Poisson's ratio core rockfill dam Nuozadu Hydropower Station
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1DUNCAN J M, CHANG Chin-yung Y. Non-linear analysis of stress and strain in soils[J] .Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 1970,96(5) : 1629-1653. 被引量:1
  • 2DUNCAN J M, BYRNE P, WONG K, et al. Stress-Strain and bulk modulous paramaitres for finite element analysis of stress and movements in soils masses, Report No. UCB/GT/80-01 [ R]. Berkeley: Univ of California, 1980. 被引量:1
  • 3钱家欢.土工原理与计算[M].北京:水利电力出版社,1994. 被引量:32
  • 4殷宗泽,张坤勇,朱俊高.面板堆石坝应力变形计算中考虑土的各向异性[J].水利学报,2004,35(11):22-26. 被引量:16

二级参考文献1

  • 1Fitzpatrick M D,Liggins T B, Barnett R H W. Ten years Surveillance of Cethana Dam [C].14th ICOLD Congress, Q55,R30,1982. 被引量:1

共引文献46

同被引文献165

引证文献21

二级引证文献87

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部