期刊文献+

反事实思维研究综述 被引量:8

An Overview of Counterfactual Thinking Research
下载PDF
导出
摘要 反事实思维是指个体对过去事件加以心理否定并构建出一种可能性假设的思维活动。根据前提性质可分为加法式、减法式和替代式,根据命题比较的方法可分为上行反事实和下行反事实。它的形成过程可分为激发阶段和内容形成阶段,其功能有情绪功能和准备功能等。运用反事实思维策略探索心理问题形成的根源并积极进行干预,将会对青少年良好个性和心理品质形成产生重要影响。 Counterfactual thinking is a thinking activity of denying past events and meanwhile generating a possible hypothesis. According to the nature of premise, it can be classified into additive, subtractive and substitutional, and according counterfactual or downward counterfactual. to the method of premise comparison, it is either upward Counterfactual thinking is formed in two stages, i. e. activation stage arid content stage, and has emotional and preparatory functions. This thinking strategy can be utilized to explore the causes of psychological can exert an important influence upon the formation problems and to conduct active intervention which of youth's good personality and healthy psychology.
作者 赵晶 诸燕
出处 《西南交通大学学报(社会科学版)》 2008年第1期23-26,共4页 Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University(Social Sciences)
关键词 反事实思维 心理健康教育 负性情绪 青少年心理 counterfactual thinking psychology health education negative emotion adolescent psychology
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献43

  • 1Landman J. Regret and elation following action and inaction: affective responses to positive versus negative outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1987, 13: 524-526. 被引量:1
  • 2Trabasso T, Bartolone J. Story understanding and counterfactual reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2003, 29(5): 904-923. 被引量:1
  • 3Davis C G, Leman D R., Wortman C B. et al. The undoing of traumatic life events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1995, 21: 109-124. 被引量:1
  • 4Zeelenberg M, van den Bos K, van Dijk E, et al. The inaction effect in the psychology of regret. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 2002, 82:314-327. 被引量:1
  • 5Roese N J, Olson J M. Self-esteem and counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1993, 65:199-206. 被引量:1
  • 6Sanna L J, Turley K J. Antecedents to spontaneous counterfactual thinking: Effects of expectancy violation and outcome valence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1996, 22(9): 906-919. 被引量:1
  • 7Meyers-Levy J, Maheswaran D. When timing matters: The influence of temporal distance on consumers' affective and persuasive responses. Journal of Consumer Research, 1992, 19:424--433. 被引量:1
  • 8Medvec V H., Savitsky K. When doing better means feeling worse: The effects of categorical cutoff points on counterfactual thinking and satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997, 72(6): 1284-1296. 被引量:1
  • 9Medvec V H., Madey S F, Gilovich T, et al. When less is more: Counterfactual thinking and satisfaction among Olympic medallists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995, 69(4): 603-610. 被引量:1
  • 10Seelau E P, Seelau S M, Wells G, et al. Counterfactual constraints. Mahwah, N J, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 1995:57-79. 被引量:1

共引文献30

同被引文献59

引证文献8

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部