期刊文献+

胆管损伤的早期处理 被引量:5

Early management of bile duct injury
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨胆管损伤的早期处理方法及治疗效果。方法 总结第四军医大学西京医院和解放军四五一医院2000年1月至2007年7月24972例胆囊切除中110例胆管损伤患者的治疗方法。早期处理包括:保守治疗、一期修补、胆管对端吻合、胆肠Roux-en-Y吻合、带蒂组织瓣修补、二次开腹引流、ERCP+ENBD。经过上述方法处理后未再手术者视为早期处理效果良好,再次接受手术治疗或内镜下置入支架治疗者视为早期处理效果不佳。结果 110例胆管损伤早期处理后效果良好的比例,胆管壁单纯裂口伤为100%(19/19);Bismuth Ⅰ型为57%(20/35),Ⅱ型为50%(21/42),Ⅲ型为38%(3/8),Ⅳ型为0(0/6)。开放法胆囊切除术造成的胆管损伤,修复后远期疗效优于LC。结论 胆管损伤越重,再次手术率越高。胆管损伤的处理要根据损伤类型、局部和全身情况,选择最佳方法,以获得良好的远期效果。 Objective To investigate early management of bile duct injury and evaluate the long-term outcome. Methods The management experience of 110 bile duct injuries out of 24 972 patients who underwent cholecystectomy from January 2000 to July 2007 in Xijing Hospital and No. 451 Hospital of PLA was reviewed retrospectively. Ways of early management included conservative treatment, primary repair, duct-to-duct anastomosis, Roux-en-Y cholangiojejunostomy, bile duct repair with pedicle tissue flaps, secondary drainage, and ERCP + nasobiliary drainage. Good result was defined that the patients did not undergo any surgical procedure after the early management, while poor result was defined that the patients who received operation or stent under endoscope after the early management. Results For patients with simple tear of bile duct, bile duct stricture of Bismuth Grade Ⅰ, Grade Ⅰ, Grade Ⅲ and Grade Ⅳ, the ratio of good long-term outcome after early management was 100% ( 19/19), 57% (20/35) , 50% (21/42) , 38% (3/8) and 0(0/6) , respectively. The long-term outcome of bile duct injury caused by open cholecystectomy was better than that caused by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Conclusions Choice of early management for bile duct injury depends on the type of injury and the condition of the patient.
出处 《中华消化外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 2008年第1期19-21,共3页 Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery
关键词 胆管损伤 早期处理 Bile duct injury Early management
  • 相关文献

同被引文献27

  • 1蔡振寨,鲁临,李兆申.胆道损伤内镜介入治疗[J].国外医学(消化系疾病分册),2004,24(5):265-267. 被引量:7
  • 2刘哲,段卫东,刘永雄.医源性胆管损伤致伤机制与分类初探[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2005,11(3):161-163. 被引量:33
  • 3王小忠,彭云恒,廖文鹏.腹腔镜胆囊切除术预防肝外胆管损伤的体会[J].现代医院,2005,5(9):27-28. 被引量:13
  • 4段建平,廖宣明,梅建民,余昌中.医源性胆道损伤的预防及处理[J].中国实用外科杂志,2007,27(7):546-548. 被引量:34
  • 5Kayhan B, Akdogan M, Sahin B. ERCP subsequent to retroperitoneal perforation caused by endoscopic sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endose ,2004,60 ( 5 ) : 833 - 835. 被引量:1
  • 6Enns R, Eloubeidi MA, Mergener K, et al. ERCP-related perforations: risk factors and management. Endoscopy, 2002,34 (4) : 293 - 298. 被引量:1
  • 7Preetha M, Chung YF, Chart WH, et al. Surgical management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforations. ANZ J Surg,2003,73 (12) : 1011 - 1014. 被引量:1
  • 8Wu HM, Dixon E, May GR, et al. Management of perforation after endoscopic retrosrade cholangiopancreatosxaphy (ERCP) : a population-based review. HPB ( Oxford ) ,2006,8 ( 5 ) : 393 - 399. 被引量:1
  • 9Lai CH, Lau WY. Management of encloscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforation. Surgeon,2008,6(1) :45 -48. 被引量:1
  • 10Avgerinos DV, Llaguna OH, Lo AY, et al. Management of endoscopic retrograde eholangiopancreatography: related duodenal perforations. Surg Endosc ,2009,23 (4) : 833 - 838. 被引量:1

引证文献5

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部