摘要
国际法视野下的中日东海争端,是中日两国围绕能源安全在国际法领域展开的关于东海大陆架划界的争夺和较量。在东海争端中,中国主张公平原则以及与之相适应的自然延伸原则。自然延伸原则在适用东海大陆架划界上具备坚实的国际法文本依据、地理法律事实依据、国际司法判例依据。日本主张的中间线原则不过是一种简便的划界方法,并不具备国际法原则地位,因此,日本无权将中间线原则强加给中国。
The Sino- Japanese. Issue in file East China Sea in view of international law refers to China and Japan to revolve the energy security capturing which launches in the international law domain. In file East China Sea issue, China advocats the fair principle and the nature extension principle. The nature extension principle is applied to the delimitation of the continental shelf in the East China Sea,because it has the solid international law textbasis, the geography legal fact basis and the international judicial legal precedent basis. The median line principle that Japan advocated is a simple method of demarcation, however, does not have the status of the principles of international law, therefore, Japan has no right to impose a middle line to China.
出处
《长春师范学院学报》
2008年第1期21-26,共6页
Journal of Changchun Teachers Coliege
基金
国家社科基金青年项目(07CKS002(2007-2009))
关键词
国际法
大陆架
公平原则
自然延伸原则
中间线原则
the international law
continental shelf
fair principle
the nature extension principle
the median line principle