期刊文献+

复合树脂嵌体修复磨牙缺损的临床疗效观察 被引量:14

Clinical evaluation of composite inlays in defective molars
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察复合树脂嵌体修复磨牙缺损的临床疗效。方法选择163例磨牙缺损患者的200颗患牙,将其分为2组,每组患牙100颗。分别采用直接法复合树脂嵌体和复合树脂直接充填修复患牙。于修复完成6个月和5年复诊。采用美国公共卫生署修复体临床评价标准对患者口内充填体进行疗效评价。结果修复后6个月,嵌体修复成功率为91.8%(90/98),树脂直接充填成功率为91.8%(89/97),经Х^2检验两者临床疗效差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。修复后5年,嵌体修复成功率为87.9%(80/91),树脂直接充填修复成功率为67.4%(60/89),Х^2检验显示嵌体的临床疗效优于树脂直接充填,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论复合树脂嵌体修复磨牙缺损临床疗效良好,其长期临床疗效显著优于传统复合树脂直接充填。 Objective To evaluate clinical effect of composite inlays in the defective molars. Methods A total of 200 defective molars from 163 patients were divided into two groups, including 100 molars of each. One group was restored with the direct composite inlays and another group with the traditional composite fillings. All the restorations were evaluated in oral cavity after 6-month and 5-year filling or insertion with United States public health service criterions. The data were analyzed using SPSS 11.0 software with the chi-square test. The significance level was set at 5%. Results In clinical service for 6 months, the successful rate of composite inlays was 91.8% (90/98) and the corresponding figure for traditional composite fillings was 91. 8% ( 89/97 ) , but there was no statistically significant difference (P 〉 0.05). In clinical service for 5 years, the successful rate of composite inlay was 87.9% (80/91), the corresponding figure for the traditional composite fillings being 67.4% (60/89)and the difference was statistically significant ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusions In clinical, the defective molars can be well restored with the direct composite inlays. Especially in the long-term clinical service, the composite inlays show significant superiority over the traditional composite fillings.
出处 《中华口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第1期44-47,共4页 Chinese Journal of Stomatology
关键词 复合树脂类 牙修复 永久 治疗结果 嵌体 Composite resins Dental restoration permanent Treatment outcome Inlay
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1van Dijken JW. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up. J Dent, 2000, 28(5) :299-306. 被引量:1
  • 2Yilmaz D, Gemalmaz D. Clinical evaluation of class Ⅱ Taros inlays: preliminary results after 1 year. J Oral Rehabil, 2003, 30(8) :855-860. 被引量:1
  • 3Manhart J, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Chen HY,et al. A 2-year clinical study of composite and ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Investi,2000.4(4) : 192-198. 被引量:1
  • 4Lempel E, Toth V, Szalma J, et al. Clinical evaluation of a quality criteria system for ceramic inlay restorations. Fogorv Sz, 2006, 99( 1 ) :3-8. 被引量:1
  • 5Papthanasiou A, Bardwell D. Marginal adaptation of three class Ⅱ composite restorative techniques in vitro. J Mass Dent Soc,2001, 50(2) :30-32. 被引量:1
  • 6Peutzfeldt A. Effect of temperature and duration of pos-cure on in vitro wear and quantity of remaining double bonds of resins containing carboxylic anhydride. Eur J Oral Sci, 1995,103 (4) : 259-263. 被引量:1
  • 7Pongprueksa P, Kuphasuk W, Senawongse P. Effect of elastic cavity wall and occlusal loading on microleakage and dentin bond strength. Oper Dent ,2007,32 ( 5 ) :466-475. 被引量:1
  • 8殷晓春.后牙复合树脂嵌体在牙体修复中的临床应用[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,2006,16(1):23-23. 被引量:7
  • 9单湘芹.硬质树脂嵌体修复第1恒磨牙大面积缺损疗效观察[J].黑龙江医学,2005,29(6):481-481. 被引量:4
  • 10Wassell RW, Walls AW, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: three-year clinical results. Br Dent J,1995, 179(9) : 343-349. 被引量:1

共引文献9

同被引文献61

引证文献14

二级引证文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部