摘要
黄志强在《"因明研究"指误》《评因明研究中的几个误区》二文中对因明研究中的七处"指误",混淆了属、种概念与属性概念、具体概念,对陈那因明的同、异品、因三相、九句因的涵义理解有误,对三支因明中的推理性质、推理规则等的看法也存在问题,有不少是黄文的自误。
Huang zhi-qiang, the author of ＂Identifying Errors in Hetuvidya Research＂ and ＂Discussion on a Few Errors in Hetuvidya Research＂, pointed out seven errors in Hetuvidya research in the above two papers. By synthesizing other scholars＇ correlative researches in Hetuvidya, I proposed in this article that some viewpoints in Huang＇s articles are correct and manifested Huang＇s deeper cognition in Hetuvidya research. However, some viewpoints are still worth discussing, even there have many mistakes made by Huang himself. Meanwhile, I think that the mistakes need further debating.
出处
《广西师范学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2007年第4期132-136,共5页
Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University：Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
关键词
因明
指误
自误
Hetuvidya
Identifying Errors
